首页> 外文期刊>Materials & design >Numerical assessment of stiffness and dent properties of automotive exterior panels
【24h】

Numerical assessment of stiffness and dent properties of automotive exterior panels

机译:汽车外饰板刚度和凹痕性能的数值评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of thinner sheets and the introduction of new materials have lead to greater focus on the stiffness and dent resistance of exterior panels in the automotive industry during the last years. This paper describes an investigation of the suitability of FE analysis as a means to determine the stiffness and dent properties of panels. The investigation covers two parts, experiments and simulations. The results are then compared in order to assess the accuracy of the simulation technique. The study is based on an automotive side-door. Two sets of simulations were carried out. In the first set stamping effects were neglected. In the second set stamping effects were taken into account in terms of thickness changes and work-hardening effects. When dealing with the stiffness properties, the simulations show great accuracy in results. It is shown that simulating dent resistance using nominal material values leads to an underestimation of the dent resistance. The extent of this underestimation depends highly on the post-stamping strain level. At low strain levels, nominal values give satisfactory accuracy whereas in regions with high strain levels the accuracy of the simulations becomes slightly worse. When work-hardening effects are taken into account, the dent resistance is overestimated. Again the deviation from experimental results becomes more obvious in regions with high strain levels. This may be related to the assumption of isotropic-hardening, which most likely overestimates the yield stress after stamping.
机译:在过去的几年中,使用更薄的薄板和引入新材料已导致人们更加关注汽车行业中外板的刚度和抗凹陷性。本文介绍了有限元分析作为确定面板刚度和凹痕特性的方法的适用性的调查。调查涵盖两个部分,实验和模拟。然后比较结果,以评估仿真技术的准确性。该研究基于汽车的侧门。进行了两组模拟。在第一组中,冲压效果被忽略。在第二组中,在厚度变化和加工硬化效果方面考虑了冲压效果。当处理刚度特性时,仿真结果显示出很高的准确性。结果表明,使用标称材料值模拟防凹痕电阻会导致对防凹痕电阻的低估。这种低估的程度在很大程度上取决于冲压后的应变水平。在低应变水平下,标称值可提供令人满意的精度,而在高应变水平的区域中,模拟的精度会稍差一些。考虑到加工硬化效果时,抗凹痕性被高估了。同样,在高应变水平的区域,与实验结果的偏差变得更加明显。这可能与各向同性硬化的假设有关,该假设很可能高估了冲压后的屈服应力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号