首页> 外文期刊>Marketing Science >Firm Strategies in the'Mid Tail'of Platform-Based Retailing
【24h】

Firm Strategies in the'Mid Tail'of Platform-Based Retailing

机译:基于平台的零售“尾巴”中的公司策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While millions of products are sold on its retail platform, Amazon.com itself stocks and sells only a very small fraction of them. Most of these products are sold by third-party sellers who pay Amazon a fee for each unit sold. Empirical evidence clearly suggests that Amazon tends to sell high-demand products and leave long-tail products for independent sellers to offer. We investigate how a platform owner such as Amazon, facing ex ante demand uncertainty, may strategically learn from these sellers' early sales which of the "mid-tail" products are worthwhile for its direct selling and which are best left for others to sell. The platform owner's "cherry-picking" of the successful products, however, gives an independent seller the incentive to mask any high demand by lowering his sales with a reduced service level (unobserved by the platform owner).We analyze this strategic interaction between a platform owner and an independent seller using a game-theoretic model with two types of sellers—one with high demand and one with low demand. We show that it may not always be optimal for the platform owner to identify the seller's demand. Interestingly, the platform owner may be worse off 'by retaining its option to sell the independent seller's product, whereas both types of sellers may benefit from the platform owner's threat of entry. The platform owner's entry option may reduce consumer surplus in the early period, although it increases consumer surplus in the later period. We also investigate how consumer reviews influence the market outcome.
机译:尽管在其零售平台上销售了数百万种产品,但Amazon.com本身拥有库存,并且只出售其中很小一部分。这些产品大多数是由第三方卖家出售的,第三方卖家向亚马逊售出的每个商品都支付一定的费用。经验证据清楚地表明,亚马逊倾向于出售高需求产品,而将长尾产品留给独立卖家提供。我们调查了平台所有者(如亚马逊)如何面对事前需求的不确定性,如何从这些卖家的早期销售中策略性地学习哪些“中尾”产品值得其直接销售,哪些则最好留给他人销售。但是,平台所有者对成功产品的“精选”使独立卖方有动机通过降低其服务水平(降低销售收入)来掩盖任何高需求(平台所有者未观察到)。平台所有者和一个独立的卖方,他们使用博弈论模型对两种类型的卖方进行分类,一种是高需求,另一种是低需求。我们表明,平台所有者确定卖方的需求可能并不总是最佳的。有趣的是,平台所有者可能会通过保留其出售独立卖方产品的选择而变得更糟,而两种类型的卖方都可能会受益于平台所有者的进入威胁。平台所有者的进入选项可能会在早期减少消费者剩余,尽管会在后期增加消费者剩余。我们还将调查消费者评论如何影响市场结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号