...
首页> 外文期刊>Marine pollution bulletin >Comparison of the polarization contrast of gelatinous zooplankton and a transparent single-use plastic bag-Implications for marine animals
【24h】

Comparison of the polarization contrast of gelatinous zooplankton and a transparent single-use plastic bag-Implications for marine animals

机译:凝胶状浮游动物偏振对比的比较和透明单用塑料袋对海洋动物的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Plastic pollution in the ocean is an increasingly detrimental issue for marine organisms. As a form of polarized light pollution, transparent plastic debris may be more visible and pose additional threats to organisms that can detect and interpret polarized light. Plastic can mimic the visual features of common marine prey items, such as transparent gelatinous zooplankton, which may lead to more significant plastic ingestion. We measured, in situ, the polarization and radiance contrast between a transparent plastic bag and gelatinous zooplankton with an underwater video polarimeter. The plastic bag had significantly higher polarization contrast than the gelatinous zooplankton, yet both shared similar radiance contrasts. This higher polarization contrast may contribute to the observed high ingestion rates of transparent plastic by marine organisms. Further study into the connection between polarization-sensitive organisms and plastic ingestion is recommended.
机译:海洋中的塑料污染是海洋生物的日益不利的问题。 作为偏振光污染的形式,透明塑料碎片可能更加可见并对可以检测和解释偏振光的生物构成额外的威胁。 塑料可以模仿普通海洋猎物物品的视觉特征,例如透明的凝胶状浮游动物,这可能导致更重要的塑料摄入。 我们原位地测量透明塑料袋和凝胶状浮游动物与水下视频偏振仪之间的偏振和辐射。 塑料袋比凝胶状浮游动物的偏振对比度显着更高,但两种相似的辐射呈对比度。 这种较高的偏振对比度可能有助于海洋生物的观察到的透明塑料的高摄取率。 建议进一步研究偏振敏感生物和塑料摄取之间的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号