...
首页> 外文期刊>Marine policy >Marine protected areas in the Southern Ocean: Is the Antarctic Treaty System ready to co-exist with a new United Nations instrument for areas beyond national jurisdiction?
【24h】

Marine protected areas in the Southern Ocean: Is the Antarctic Treaty System ready to co-exist with a new United Nations instrument for areas beyond national jurisdiction?

机译:南海的海洋保护区:南极条约系统是否随时准备与国家管辖范围之外的新联合国文书共存?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a fundamental tool for effective marine conservation and areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) prove most challenging for their designation. Largely to blame is the currently fragmented and sector-based governance framework under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982). In the face of rapidly deteriorating biodiversity in ABNJ, negotiations are underway for a new international legally binding instrument (ILBI) mandated to promote the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction using tools including MPAs. The Southern Ocean, however, is a uniquely governed space, with two MPAs already established in ABNJ under the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS). This article critically examines the status quo for designating MPAs under the ATS and uses the findings to reflect on how the system might interact with the new United Nations ILBI. Despite this critique, complementary synergies between the two instruments are still possible. I therefore hypothesise that Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties (ATCPs) and members of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) must collectively engage with the ILBI process and across instruments within the ATS, to ensure the future interplay is one of opportunity, not conflict. The article concludes with recommendations to help ATCPs and CCAMLR members more proactively and effectively engage with progressions in the international law of the sea.
机译:海洋保护区(MPA)是有效的海洋保护和国家司法管辖区(ABNJ)的基本工具,证明了他们的名称最具挑战性。在很大程度上归咎于“联合国海洋法公约”(UNCLOS,1982)下的目前碎片和基于部门的治理框架。面对ABNJ的生物多样性迅速恶化,正在为新的国际法律约束力(ILBI)进行谈判,该文具旨在促进使用包括MPAS包括MPAS的工具之外的国家管辖权的保护和可持续利用生物多样性。然而,南海是一个独特的治理空间,在南极条约系统(ATS)下的ABNJ中已经建立了两个MPA。本文批判性地审查了在ATS下指定MPA的现状,并利用了调查结果来反思系统如何与新联合国ILBI互动。尽管批评了这两种仪器之间的互补协同作用。因此,我假设南极条约协商缔约方(ATCP)和委员会委员会保护南极海洋生活资源(CCAMLR)必须集体与ILBI进程和跨ATS中的文书互动,以确保未来的相互作用是机会之一,而不是冲突。本文核准了建议,以帮助ATCPS和CCAMLR成员更积极地,有效地与国际海洋法中的进展有效地互动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号