首页> 外文期刊>Marine policy >Being heard: Thinking through different versions of rationality, epistemological policing and dissonances in marine conservation
【24h】

Being heard: Thinking through different versions of rationality, epistemological policing and dissonances in marine conservation

机译:被听到:通过海洋保护的不同版本的理性,认识论治安和不和谐思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Emerging from ethnographic research conducted on the west coast of South Africa, this paper explores the ways in which fishers contrast their experience of fishing prior to the implementation of the Marine Living Resources Act, and the rise of fortress style conservation in fisheries management. Conservation as rhetoric has been used as a powerful means of supporting and justifying fisheries management objectives. The paper argues that fishers engage with their environments in ways that are different from how management understands human-nature relations. As a consequence, fortress style fisheries management and policing disallow fishers to engage with the sea in the ways that are intrinsic to their fishing practices. This results, in many instances, in curtailing the ways in which fishers are allowed to think about and interact with the sea. With the impending implementation of EAF in South Africa and the global call for working with multiple knowledges, the paper calls for relational ways of engaging in conservation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:从在南非西海岸进行的人种学研究中,本文探索了渔民在执行《海洋生物资源法》之前对比其捕捞经验的方式,以及在渔业管理中兴起堡垒式养护的方式。保护性言论已被用作支持和证明渔业管理目标的有力手段。该论文认为,渔民以与管理者理解人与自然关系不同的方式与环境互动。结果,要塞风格的渔业管理和警务政策禁止渔民以其捕鱼行为固有的方式与海洋互动。在许多情况下,这导致限制了允许渔民思考海洋并与海洋互动的方式。随着南非渔业生态系统方法的即将实施以及全球呼吁使用多种知识的呼吁,本文呼吁采取相关的方式进行保护。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号