首页> 外文期刊>Marine Environmental Research >A comparison of stereo-BRUVs and stereo-ROV techniques for sampling shallow water fish communities on and off pipelines
【24h】

A comparison of stereo-BRUVs and stereo-ROV techniques for sampling shallow water fish communities on and off pipelines

机译:立体声BRUV和立体声ROV技术对浅水鱼群旁路管道的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We compared and contrasted fish assemblage data sampled by baited remote underwater stereo-video systems (stereo-BRUVs) and stereo-video remotely operated vehicles (stereo-ROVs) from subsea pipelines, reef and soft sediment habitats. Stereo-BRUVs sampled greater fish diversity across all three habitats, with the stereo-ROV sampling -46% of the same species on pipeline and reef habitats. Larger differences existed in soft sediment habitats, with stereo-BRUVs recording -65% more species than the stereo-ROV, the majority of which were generalist carnivores. These differences were likely due to the bait used with stereo-BRUVs attracting fish from a large and unknown area. Fish may have also avoided the moving stereo-ROV, an effect possibly magnified in open soft sediment habitats. As a result of these biases, we recommend stereo-ROVs for assessing fish communities on pipelines due to their ability to capture fish in-situ and within a defined sampling area, but caution is needed over soft sediment habitats for ecological comparisons.
机译:我们与来自海底管道,珊瑚礁和软沉积物栖息地的被诱饵远程水下的立体视频系统(立体声BRUVS)和立体视频远程操作车辆(立体声ROV)进行比较和对比的鱼组合数据。 Stereo-Bruvs在所有三个栖息地中采样更大的鱼类多样性,立体声rov采样-46%的管道和珊瑚礁栖息地。柔软沉积物栖息地存在较大的差异,立体声Bruvs比立体罗夫更多的物种,其中大多数是通用的食肉动物。这些差异可能是由于诱饵带有立体声Bruvs吸引来自一个大而未知的区域的鱼类。鱼类也可能还避免了移动的立体声ROV,这一效果在开放的软沉积物栖息地中可能放大。由于这些偏见,我们推荐立体声ROV,用于评估管道上的鱼群,由于它们在原位捕获鱼类和在定义的采样区域内,但需要谨慎对生态比较的软沉积物栖息地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号