首页> 外文期刊>Marine engineers review >Norwegians take hard line on ship beaching
【24h】

Norwegians take hard line on ship beaching

机译:挪威人对船舶靠岸采取强硬态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A third-party buyer of ships appears to be pitting shipping associations against each other as it lobbies to prevent an outright ban of beaching ships for demolition. GMS supports the Danish Ship Association (DSA)'s position that ship recycling choice should not be based on geography alone. In a thinly veiled criticism, it contrasts Denmark's stance with that of Norway, which is urging its members not to recycle ships at yards that employ 'beaching'. The DSA believes it is important that the market makes a distinction between yards which use beaching and comply with the Hong Kong Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships (HKC) and those that do not, GMS notes. Company founder and CEO Dr Anil Sharma says: "Often these decisions are made on perceptions ratherthan reality. Simply throwing money does not make ship recycling green. On the contrary, it's likely to reward inefficiencies."
机译:第三方的船舶购买者似乎在互相反对航运协会,因为它游说防止彻底禁止将海滩船拆毁。 GMS支持丹麦船舶协会(DSA)的立场,即拆船的选择不应仅基于地理位置。在一个含糊其词的批评中,它与丹麦与挪威的立场形成鲜明对比,挪威敦促其成员国不要在采用“海滩”作业的造船厂拆船。 DSA认为,重要的是,市场必须区分使用滩涂并符合《香港安全和无害化拆船公约》的造船厂和不使用造船厂的造船厂,GMS指出。公司创始人兼首席执行官Anil Sharma博士说:“通常,这些决定是根据感知而非现实而做出的。简单地投入资金并不能使船舶回收绿色化。相反,这很可能会奖励效率低下的人。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Marine engineers review》 |2015年第10期|5-5|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号