...
首页> 外文期刊>Marine ecology >Food source or refuge: What is behind amphipod choices for seaweeds?
【24h】

Food source or refuge: What is behind amphipod choices for seaweeds?

机译:食物来源或避难所:海藻的Amphipod选择背后是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To assess whether amphipods' habitat choice and feeding preference for a specific seaweed species are based on nutritional value or structural complexity, and to evaluate the role of chemical cues in the amphipod choice, we carried out laboratory experiments using amphipods (Ampithoe marcuzzii) and seaweeds from different divisions (Chlorophyta, Ochrophyta, and Rhodophyta). To evaluate feeding preference, we carried out a multiple-choice experiment offering six species of seaweeds to amphipods. To assess whether habitat choice by amphipods is guided exclusively by seaweed complexity, we conducted an assay offering seaweeds and complexity-like mimics (artificial plants) to amphipods, quantifying their choices. To evaluate whether seaweeds' secondary metabolites acted as chemical cues affecting seaweed choice by the amphipods, we used the same plastic mimics, one of which was brushed with crude extracts from the most-consumed seaweeds and a control. The consumption of Gracilaria cervicornis by amphipods was around three times higher than that of the other offered species, likely due to its paucity of chemical and physical defenses. The highest contents of nitrogen and crude proteins in this species may have contributed to its high consumption. Amphipods also used G. cervicornis as a shelter more than its mimic, but exhibited no preference between other seaweeds and their mimics, indicating that a more palatable refuge is preferred. This idea was corroborated when amphipods were able to detect chemical cues of G. cervicornis painted over a plastic mimic of similar structure and preferred it over the control mimic, which had the same complexity but no chemicals. Our results suggest that amphipods use chemical cues to identify high-quality habitat regarding refuge (complexity) and food source (nutritional value).
机译:为了评估足目动物的栖息地选择和喂养偏好特定是否海藻种类是根据营养价值或结构的复杂性,以及评价在片脚选择化学信息素的作用,我们进行了使用脚类(Ampithoe marcuzzii)实验室实验和海藻从不同区划(绿藻,淡色藻总门,红藻门和)。为了评估喂养的偏好,我们进行了一个选择题实验提供6种海藻到片脚。为了评估是否栖息地选择的片脚被海藻复杂专门的指导下,我们进行了试验提供海藻和复杂性类似模拟(仿真植物)到片脚,量化他们的选择。为了评估海藻的次生代谢产物是否担任化学信息素由足目影响海藻的选择,我们使用相同的塑料模仿,其中之一是从最消耗海藻和控制粗提物刷。江蓠的消费cervicornis的片脚比其他参团品种高出约三倍,可能是由于其化学和物理防御的缺乏。氮和粗蛋白质在该物种的最高内容可能已对其高消费作出了贡献。片脚也用于G. cervicornis作为住所比其模拟物多,但表现出其他海藻及其模拟物之间没有偏好,这表明更可口避难所是优选的。当片脚能够探测到G的化学线索cervicornis涂在塑料模拟物类似的结构的和优选它在控制模拟物,其具有相同的复杂性,但无化学这个想法被证实。我们的研究结果表明,端足目动物使用化学信号来识别关于避难(复杂性)和食物​​来源(营养价值)高品质的栖息地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号