...
首页> 外文期刊>Marine ecology progress series >Behavioural response of invasive Mytilus galloprovincialis and indigenous Perna perna mussels exposed to risk of predation
【24h】

Behavioural response of invasive Mytilus galloprovincialis and indigenous Perna perna mussels exposed to risk of predation

机译:暴露于捕食风险的入侵性Mytilus galloprovincialis和本地Perna perna贻贝的行为反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared the behavioural responses of an indigenous South African mussel (Perna perna) and an invasive mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) to the risk of predation. Both species were subjected to the specific risk of predation by the native rock lobster Jasus lalandii and the general risk of predation simulated by the presence of damaged conspecifics. We hypothesised that, because M. galloprovincialis evolved in allopatry from the rock lobster, P. perna would respond more strongly to J. lalandii, but that there would be less difference between species in their response to damaged con-specifics. The results confirmed our initial hypotheses. M. galloprovincialis crawled farther under both predation treatments and generally aggregated more than P. perna. P. perna has a larger foot, and our results therefore do not reflect morphological differences between the species but imply greater sensitivity in M. galloprovincialis to chemical cues. Crawling distance was not enhanced under predation threat relative to the control; therefore, increased clumping due to more rapid random movement cannot explain our results, indicating that chemical attraction among individuals is important. P. perna clumping behaviour was significantly greater when exposed to local lobster effluent or damaged conspecifics, whereas M. galloprovincialis clumped more when exposed to a general threat of predation but exhibited naive behaviour to local predator effluent. This lack of responsiveness to a native predator could be due not only to the recent arrival of the European mussel, but also to the relatively low selective effects of predation in South Africa.
机译:我们比较了南非土著贻贝(Perna perna)和侵入性贻贝(Mytilus galloprovincialis)对捕食风险的行为反应。两种物种都受到本地龙虾Jasus lalandii的捕食的特定风险,并且由于受损的同种生物的存在而模拟了捕食的一般风险。我们假设,由于M. galloprovincialis是从隐蔽性的龙虾演化而来的,因此P. perna对J. lalandii的反应更强烈,但物种对受损的同种物种的反应差异较小。结果证实了我们最初的假设。在两种捕食处理下,galoprovincialis爬虫爬得更远,并且聚集的总数量超过了多年生疟原虫。 P. perna的脚较大,因此我们的结果并未反映物种之间的形态差异,但暗示了Galloprovincialis对化学线索的敏感性更高。相对于对照组,在掠食威胁下爬行距离没有增加;因此,由于更快的随机运动而导致的结块增加无法解释我们的结果,表明个体之间的化学吸引很重要。暴露于当地龙虾流出物或损坏的同种菌时,多年生疟原虫的成簇行为明显更大,而当暴露于一般捕食威胁时,鸡传染性疟原虫的成团更多,但对本地捕食者流出物表现出幼稚的行为。对本土捕食者缺乏反应的原因不仅可能是由于欧洲贻贝的最新到来,也可能是由于南非捕食的选择性影响相对较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号