...
首页> 外文期刊>Marine ecology progress series >Progression of invasive lionfish in seagrass, mangrove and reef habitats
【24h】

Progression of invasive lionfish in seagrass, mangrove and reef habitats

机译:侵入性l鱼在海草,红树林和礁石栖息地的进展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The invasion of the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans into the western Atlantic, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico is the fastest ever documented for a marine fish. Few studies have addressed the establishment of lionfish populations within a location, and habitats other than reefs have been largely overlooked. The present study reconstructed the invasion around South Caicos, Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI), from multiple sources of data. Densities and size frequencies of lionfish were compared in deep reefs (10 to 30 m) and shallow habitats (seagrass, mangrove, sheltered reef, and exposed reef <5 m deep) over a 4 yr period (2007 to 2010). By the end of 2010, lionfish had been observed in all 5 habitats. There was a lag of almost 7 mo between the first sightings in shallow habitats (December 2007) and in deep reefs. After 2 to 3 yr, the density of lionfish in deep reefs surpassed those in shallow habitats. In November 2010, mean density was over 10× higher on deep reefs (9.51 lionfish seen observer~(-1) h~(-1) ± 5.37 SD) than in seagrass (0.87 ± 0.41; p < 0.05), which was significantly higher than in other shallow habitats (sheltered reef: 0.52 ± 0.47; exposed reef: 0.12 ± 0.13; and mangrove: 0.06 ± 0.10; p < 0.05). Lionfish on deep reefs (TL = 22.7 ± 7.5 cm) had significantly larger total lengths (TL; mean ± SD) than those in seagrass (TL = 15.0 ± 4.3 cm; p < 0.05) or sheltered reefs (TL = 14.6 ± 6.8 cm; p < 0.05). Assuming one population with ontogenetic movement between habitats, density and age estimates suggest that lionfish may have moved to deep reefs from other habitats. The results suggest that lionfish may settle preferentially, but not exclusively, in shallow habitats before moving to deep reefs.
机译:印度太平洋Pacific鱼Pterois volitans入侵西大西洋,加勒比海和墨西哥湾是有史以来最快的海洋鱼类。很少有研究探讨在某个地点建立of鱼种群的情况,除了礁石以外的其他栖息地都被大大忽略了。本研究从多个数据来源重建了南凯科斯,特克斯和凯科斯群岛(TCI)周围的入侵。在4年的时间段(2007年至2010年)中,比较了深礁(10至30 m)和浅生境(海草,红树林,庇护礁和暴露礁<5 m)中l鱼的密度和大小频率。到2010年底,在所有5个栖息地中都观察到了fish鱼。在浅层栖息地(2007年12月)和深礁之间的首次发现之间存在近7个月的延迟。 2至3年后,深礁中的fish鱼密度超过浅生境中的l鱼密度。 2010年11月,深海珊瑚礁的平均密度(观察者的观察者〜(-1)h〜(-1)±5.37 SD的9.5鱼为9.51)比海草的平均密度(0.87±0.41; p <0.05)高出10倍以上。高于其他浅层生境(庇护礁:0.52±0.47;裸礁:0.12±0.13;红树林:0.06±0.10; p <0.05)。深海礁(TL = 22.7±7.5 cm)上的鱼的总长度(TL;平均±SD)明显大于海草(TL = 15.0±4.3 cm; p <0.05)或庇护礁石(TL = 14.6±6.8 cm) ; p <0.05)。假设一个种群在生境之间发生了个体发育,密度和年龄估计表明l鱼可能已经从其他生境移到了深礁。结果表明,fish鱼在移至深礁之前可能会优先(但不仅限于)在浅层栖息地定居。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号