...
首页> 外文期刊>Marin Report >Is slowing down always the answer to combat soaring oil prices?
【24h】

Is slowing down always the answer to combat soaring oil prices?

机译:放慢脚步总是解决油价飞涨的答案吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Towering bunker prices are clearly here to stay and they will finally lead to either lowering vessel design speeds, or to a further increase in vessel size. But will short-term speed changes solve every case? A rough theoretical estimation suggests that adding one vessel to an existing fleet of seven on a 21 days return schedule (two sailings a week), facilitates a 14% speed reduction. This means propulsion power reduction of about 30% for the whole fleet and an increase in sailing frequency (one sailing every 3 days rather than 3.5 days) and obviously an increase in sailing time (+3 days). Crew and capital costs will increase but still a net gain is feasible. However, not every trade has such an easy gain. A smaller number of vessels on short haul trades complicates the short-term speed regime changes. It is clear in the long-term, increasing vessel size will payoff better.
机译:ing堡的燃油价格显然将保持不变,最终将导致船只设计速度降低,或船只尺寸进一步增加。但是短期的速度变化会解决所有情况吗?粗略的理论估计表明,按21天的返回时间表(每周两次航行)在现有的7艘船队中增加一艘船,可以使速度降低14%。这意味着整个船队的推进功率降低约30%,航行频率增加(每3天而不是3.5天航行一次),并且航行时间明显增加(+3天)。船员和资本成本将增加,但净收益仍然可行。但是,并非每笔交易都能获得如此轻松的收益。短途贸易中较少数量的船舶使短期航速变化变得复杂。从长期来看,显然,增加船只尺寸将带来更好的回报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号