【24h】

Competitive Customization

机译:竞争定制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We consider a duopoly market with heterogeneous customer tastes. The firms play a two-stage game. First, each firm chooses whether to invest in mass customization, which would enable it to offer customized products that increasingly match each customer's ideal product as the chosen customization level increases. A firm that chooses not to invest in mass customization serves a standard product. Second, the firms competitively price their product lines. We characterize each firm's investment in mass customization and study its dependence on competitive position, as determined by its cost efficiency and perceived quality vis-à-vis its competitor. We find that the value of mass customization critically depends on the firm's competitive position. It may not be desirable even at zero cost due to its negative effect on price competition. A firm with an overall cost and quality disadvantage never unilaterally adopts mass customization. We show that allowing firms to set different prices for each product configuration leads to a broader adoption of mass customization compared to when they are restricted to uniform prices. However, a firm's chosen customization level may be higher with uniform prices. Our analysis also helps a customizing firm determine whether to target its process improvement efforts for a lower cost or a higher customization level.
机译:我们考虑具有不同客户口味的双头市场。这些公司进行两阶段的博弈。首先,每个公司都选择是否进行大规模定制投资,这将使其能够提供定制产品,随着所选定制水平的提高,该定制产品与每个客户的理想产品越来越匹配。选择不进行大规模定制投资的公司将提供标准产品。其次,公司以竞争性方式为其产品线定价。我们对每家公司在大规模定制方面的投资进行表征,并研究其对竞争地位的依赖性,这取决于其成本效率和相对于竞争对手的感知质量。我们发现大规模定制的价值关键取决于公司的竞争地位。由于其对价格竞争的负面影响,即使成本为零也可能是不希望的。总体上在成本和质量上处于劣势的公司永远不会单方面采用大规模定制。我们表明,与将公司局限于统一价格的情况相比,允许公司为每种产品配置设置不同的价格导致大规模定制的广泛采用。但是,在统一价格的情况下,公司选择的定制级别可能会更高。我们的分析还可以帮助定制公司确定是以较低成本还是较高定制水平为目标的过程改进工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号