首页> 外文期刊>Manufacturing_Service Operations Management >Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition
【24h】

Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition

机译:大规模定制与大规模生产:品种和价格竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We study competition between two multiproduct firms with distinct production technologies in a market where customers have heterogeneous preferences on a single taste attribute. The mass customizer (MC) has a perfectly flexible production technology and thus can offer any variety within a product space, represented by Hotelling's linear city. The mass producer (MP) has a more focused production technology and therefore offers a finite set of products in the same space. The MP can invest in more flexible technology, which reduces its cost of variety and hence allows it to offer a larger set of products; in the extreme, the MP can emulate the MC's technology and offer infinite variety. The firms simultaneously decide whether to enter the market, and the MP chooses its degree of product-mix flexibility on entry. Next, the MP designs its product line—i.e., the number and position of its products—the MC's perfectly flexible technology makes this unnecessary. Finally, both firms simultaneously set prices. We analyze the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium in this three-stage game, allowing firm-specific fixed and variable costs that together characterize their production technology. We find that an MP facing competition from an MC offers lower product variety than an MP monopolist to reduce the intensity of price competition. We also find that the MP can survive this competition, even if it has higher fixed cost of production technology, higher marginal cost of production, or both.
机译:我们研究了在客户对单一口味属性有不同偏好的市场中具有不同生产技术的两家多产品公司之间的竞争。批量定制器(MC)具有完美灵活的生产技术,因此可以在以Hotelling的线性城市为代表的产品空间内提供任何品种。批量生产者(MP)具有更集中的生产技术,因此在同一空间中提供有限的产品集。 MP可以投资于更灵活的技术,从而降低其多样化的成本,因此可以提供更多的产品。在极端情况下,MP可以模仿MC的技术并提供无限的多样性。这些公司同时决定是否进入市场,而国会议员则在进入时选择其产品组合灵活性的程度。接下来,MP设计其产品线(即产品的数量和位置),MC的完全灵活的技术使其不必要。最后,两家公司同时设定价格。我们在此三阶段博弈中分析了子博弈完美的纳什均衡,从而使特定于公司的固定成本和可变成本成为其生产技术的特征。我们发现,面对MC竞争的MP相比MP垄断者提供的产品种类更少,从而降低了价格竞争的强度。我们还发现,即使MP具有更高的生产技术固定成本和/或更高的边际成本,MP仍能在竞争中生存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号