...
首页> 外文期刊>Manufacturing and service operations management >Selling a Product Line Through a Retailer When Demand Is Stochastic: Analysis of Price-Only Contracts
【24h】

Selling a Product Line Through a Retailer When Demand Is Stochastic: Analysis of Price-Only Contracts

机译:需求随机时通过零售商销售产品线:仅价格合同的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Problem description: In practice, many consumer products are produced and stocked in product lines rather than in single product variants. The issue is that manufacturers and retailers often do not agree on the product line length (i.e., the number of variants included in the product line). The focus of this study is to understand how product line length and stocking quantities depend on how demand risk is contractually allocated. Academic/practical relevance: Our model combines assortment and stocking decisions in the presence of stochastic demand; previous models could address either assortment or stocking issues, but not necessarily both. Methodology: We present a game-theoretic model of a bilateral supply chain in which a manufacturer (he) sells up to two differentiated products through a retailer (she). He decides which products to produce, their wholesale prices, and how to allocate demand risk. We theorize that he can either retain the risk (by adopting a pull contract) or that he can pass it onto the retailer (by adopting a push contract). She responds by choosing assortment, quantities, and retail prices. By solving the model, we develop a descriptive theory that clarifies his incentive to expand his product offering and to reallocate demand risk within the supply chain. Results: Depending on the level of product differentiation, we identify three regions. When product differentiation is either low (commodities) or high (specialized products), the contract choice affects order quantities but not assortment. In these regions, the manufacturer's contract choice can be explained by looking at elasticity of wholesale demand. For products with some differentiation, the manufacturer's contract choice affects both order quantities and assortment. In this region, the manufacturer's contract choice can be explained by looking at the additive effect of demand elasticity and sales expansion from the extended product line net of cannibalization. Managerial implications: Our paper can be seen as a first step toward developing a link between optimal product line design and optimal risk allocation in a bilateral supply chain.
机译:问题描述:在实践中,许多消费类产品是在产品线而不是单个产品变体中生产和存储的。问题在于,制造商和零售商通常不同意产品线的长度(即产品线中包含的变体数量)。这项研究的重点是了解产品线长度和库存数量如何取决于合同约定的需求风险分配方式。学术/实践相关性:在存在随机需求的情况下,我们的模型将分类和库存决策结合在一起;先前的模型可以解决分类或库存问题,但不一定同时解决。方法:我们提出了双边供应链的博弈论模型,其中制造商(他)通过零售商(她)出售最多两种差异化产品。他决定生产哪些产品,批发价格以及如何分配需求风险。我们认为,他可以保留风险(通过采用拉动合同),也可以将风险转移给零售商(通过采用推销合同)。她通过选择分类,数量和零售价格做出回应。通过求解模型,我们建立了描述性理论,阐明了他扩大产品范围并在供应链中重新分配需求风险的动机。结果:根据产品差异化程度,我们确定了三个区域。当产品差异较低(商品)或较高(特殊产品)时,合同选择会影响订单数量,但不会影响分类。在这些地区,可以通过考虑批发需求的弹性来解释制造商的合同选择。对于具有差异性的产品,制造商的合同选择会影响订单数量和分类。在该地区,制造商的合同选择可以通过考虑需求弹性和扩展的同类产品网中的销售扩展的叠加效应来解释。对管理的影响:本文可以看作是在双边供应链中建立最佳产品线设计和最佳风险分配之间联系的第一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号