首页> 外文期刊>Manufacturing and service operations management >Double Counting in Supply Chain Carbon Footprinting
【24h】

Double Counting in Supply Chain Carbon Footprinting

机译:供应链碳足迹的重复计算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Carbon footprinting is a tool for firms to determine the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with their supply chain or with a unit of final product or service. Carbon footprinting typically aims to identify where best to invest in emission reduction efforts, and/or to determine the proportion of total emissions that an individual firm is accountable for, whether financially and/or operationally. A major and underrecognized challenge in determining the appropriate allocation stems from the high degree to which GHG emissions are the result of joint efforts by multiple firms. We introduce a simple but general model of joint production of GHG emissions in general supply chains, decomposing the total footprint into processes, each of which can be influenced by any combination of firms. We analyze two main scenarios. In the first scenario, the social planner allocates emissions to individual firms and imposes a cost on them (such as a carbon tax) in proportion to the emissions allocated. In the second scenario, a carbon leader voluntarily agrees to offset all emissions in the entire supply chain and then contracts with individual firms to recoup (part of) the costs of those offsets. In both cases, we find that, to induce the optimal effort levels, the emissions need to be overallocated, even if the carbon tax is the true social cost of carbon. This is in contrast to the usual focus in the life-cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon footprinting literatures on avoiding double counting. Our work aims to lay the foundation for a framework to integrate the economics- and LCA-based perspectives on supply chain carbon footprinting.
机译:碳足迹是企业确定与其供应链或最终产品或服务单位相关的总温室气体(GHG)排放的工具。碳足迹通常旨在确定在减排工作上最好投资的地方,和/或确定单个公司在财务和/或运营方面应负责的总排放量的比例。在确定适当的分配方面,一个主要的,未被充分认识的挑战是温室气体排放的高度归因于多家公司共同努力的结果。我们介绍了一个简单但通用的联合模型,该模型在一般供应链中联合生产GHG排放,将总足迹分解为流程,每个流程都可能受到任何企业组合的影响。我们分析了两种主要情况。在第一种情况下,社会计划者将排放分配给各个公司,并根据分配的排放向它们施加成本(例如碳税)。在第二种情况下,碳排放负责人自愿同意抵消整个供应链中的所有排放,然后与个别公司签约以补偿(部分)抵消成本。在这两种情况下,我们都发现,即使要征收碳税是碳的真正社会成本,也要过度分配排放量以诱导最佳努力水平。这与生命周期评估(LCA)和碳足迹文献中通常的避免重复计算的关注形成对比。我们的工作旨在为框架提供基础,以整合基于经济学和LCA的供应链碳足迹观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号