...
首页> 外文期刊>Management Review Quarterly >Extending Fisch and Block's (2018) tips for a systematic review in management and business literature
【24h】

Extending Fisch and Block's (2018) tips for a systematic review in management and business literature

机译:扩展FISCH和块(2018)管理和商业文献系统审查提示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A systematic literature review is designed to synthesize meaningful knowledge from a large number of studies on a research topic. Over the past decade, management researchers have begun to adopt this review methodology with a goal of providing a comprehensive understanding of a business literature topic. This methodology can provide a context for existing literature, guide future research, and by translating theoretical observations into useable real-world principles, help business leaders make better decisions. A systematic literature review serves a different purpose than a traditional literature review, providing a more organized and complete exploration of research literature. However, systematic literature review is new to many management researchers. To aid in the understanding of this methodology, the editors of Management Review Quarterly, Fisch and Block (Mange Rev Q 68:103-106,2018), present six tips for conducting a systematic literature review. In this paper, we will examine their six tips, which we applied in a recent systematic literature review of leader credibility. By sharing our thoughts on the application of their tips, we hope to bolster the rigor and consistency of future systematic reviews of management literature. In addition to Fisch and Block's six tips, based on our experiences, we offer three additional tips that became evident in our work to aid in future systematic literature reviews.
机译:系统的文献综述旨在综合从研究主题的大量研究综合有意义的知识。在过去的十年中,管理层研究人员已经开始采用这一综述方法,以实现对业务文献主题的全面了解。该方法可以为现有文献提供背景,引导未来的研究,并通过将理论观察转化为可用的现实原则,帮助商业领袖做出更好的决策。系统文献综述比传统文献综述提供不同的目的,提供了对研究文献的更具组织和完全探索。然而,系统文献综述是许多管理研究人员的新型。为了帮助理解这种方法,管理审查的编辑季刊,FISCH和块(Mange Rev Q 68:103-106,2018),为进行系统文献综述提供六个提示。在本文中,我们将研究其六个提示,我们在最近的最近系统文献综述对领导者可信度的审查中。通过分享我们对他们提示的应用的思考,我们希望能够加强对管理文献未来系统审查的严格和一致性。除了FISCH和Block的六个提示,根据我们的经验,我们还提供三个额外提示,在我们的工作中可以升级,以帮助未来的系统文学评论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号