首页> 外文期刊>Management Research News >Validation of the moral competency inventory measurement instrument: Content, construct, convergent and discriminant approaches
【24h】

Validation of the moral competency inventory measurement instrument: Content, construct, convergent and discriminant approaches

机译:道德能力清单测量工具的验证:内容,构建,融合和判别方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce practitioners to the appropriate use of measures of unethical behaviour, evaluate the use of integrity-related assessments for use in personnel selection, and determine the validity of the moral competency index (MCI) instrument using standard validation procedures.rnDesign/methodology/approach - Content, construct, convergent and discriminant approaches are applied to establish the relative validity of the assessment tool.rnFindings - The results of the MCI purport to align with one's moral values and behaviours. The paper establishes face validity of the MCI measure, but fails to establish an appropriate simple factor structure, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and support for. the lack of impact of demographic factors on the purported measure of moral intelligence.rnResearch limitations/implications - An acceptable but constrained (working students) sample was used in the validation.rnPractical implications - Researchers and practitioners should be familiar with psychometric principles to ensure the use of valid tools in a predictive and defensible manner. New measures can be developed, but should be validated before being used for developmental or personnel decision-making purposes.rnOriginality/value - This paper establishes the lack of validity associated with the MCI instrument; researchers and practitioners are exposed to considerations in the appropriate use of measures of unethical behaviour, and exposed to several previously validated integrity-related assessments for use in personnel decision-making.
机译:目的-本文的目的是向从业人员介绍不道德行为测度的适当使用,评估与诚信相关的评估在人员选择中的使用,并使用标准确定道德能力指数(MCI)工具的有效性验证程序。设计/方法/方法-采用内容,构造,融合和判别方法来建立评估工具的相对有效性。研究结果-MCI的结果旨在与个人的道德价值观和行为保持一致。本文建立了MCI度量的面效度,但未能建立适当的简单因子结构,收敛效度,判别效度和支持度。研究人员的局限性/含义-可接受但受约束的(在职学生)样本用于验证。实践意义-研究人员和从业人员应熟悉心理计量学原理以确保以可预测和可辩护的方式使用有效工具。可以制定新的措施,但应先进行验证,然后再用于发展或人员决策目的。rn原始性/价值-本文确定了与MCI工具相关的有效性不足;研究人员和从业人员在适当使用不道德行为的措施时要考虑各种因素,并要经过几项先前经过验证的完整性相关评估,以用于人员决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号