首页> 外文期刊>Magazine of Concrete Research >Upper bounds, lower bounds and 'exact' yield-line design: structural concrete in plane stress
【24h】

Upper bounds, lower bounds and 'exact' yield-line design: structural concrete in plane stress

机译:上限,下限和“精确”屈服线设计:结构混凝土在平面应力下

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Plane-stress plasticity, at its simplest, assumes rigid-plastic materials and inherits the bound theorems of classic rigid-plastic theory. There are, again, upper-bounds, lower-bounds and 'exact' solutions: (a) an upper bound must display a detailed kinematically correct collapse mechanism while (b) a lower-bound must satisfy equilibrium everywhere and (c) an 'exact' solution is unique, certainly as to collapse load and often, but not always, as to the collapse mechanism. Exact solutions tend to flow from upper bounds because of the mechanism condition. Solely lower-bound solutions are necessarily arbitrary. As in other areas of structural plasticity, there is a tendency to focus on lower-bound solutions thereby avoiding the rigour required in formulating a kinematically correct collapse mechanism. In the case of plane stress, this has resulted in disproportionate attention being paid to the strut-and-tie method. This paper sets out to demonstrate that upper-bound and 'exact' solutions are not largely unknown or unknowable and seeks to restore balance between upper-, lower-bound and 'exact' solutions. This author is working on other papers to exhibit novel and little-known 'exact' solutions for plane-stress problems. One purpose of this paper is to extract and summarise the general discussion and theory so that those other papers can focus on problem solving.
机译:平面应力可塑性最简单的假设是刚性塑性材料,并继承了经典刚性塑性理论的约束定理。同样,还有上限,下限和“精确”解决方案:(a)上限必须显示详细的运动学上正确的崩溃机制,而(b)下限必须在任何地方都满足平衡,并且(c)“ “精确”解决方案是唯一的,当然可以解决崩溃的负载问题,而对于崩溃机制经常(但并非总是)有帮助。由于机制条件的缘故,精确的解往往从上限流出。唯一的低界解决方案必然是任意的。如同在结构可塑性的其他领域一样,有一种趋势集中在下限解决方案上,从而避免了在制定运动学上正确的塌陷机制时所要求的严格性。在平面应力的情况下,这导致了对拉杆-拉杆方法的过多关注。本文着手证明上限和“精确”解决方案在很大程度上不是未知的或不可知的,并试图恢复上限,下限和“精确”解决方案之间的平衡。作者正在其他论文上展示平面应力问题的鲜为人知的“精确”解决方案。本文的目的之一是提取和总结一般性的讨论和理论,以便其他论文可以专注于解决问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Magazine of Concrete Research》 |2011年第3期|p.175-186|共12页
  • 作者

    C.Gurley;

  • 作者单位

    TAFE NSW, Sydney Institute of Technology, NSW, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号