首页> 外文期刊>Long Range Planning >Comments on 'Mastering strategic renewal: Mobilising renewal journeys in multi -unit firms', Henk W. Volberda, Charles Baden -Fuller, Frans Ad. van den Bosch Long Range Planning, Volume 34, Issue 2, April 2001, Pages 159-178
【24h】

Comments on 'Mastering strategic renewal: Mobilising renewal journeys in multi -unit firms', Henk W. Volberda, Charles Baden -Fuller, Frans Ad. van den Bosch Long Range Planning, Volume 34, Issue 2, April 2001, Pages 159-178

机译:Henk W. Volberda,Charles Baden -Fuller和Frans Ad对“掌握战略更新:动员多部门公司的更新之旅”的评论。 van den Bosch远程规划,第34卷,第2期,2001年4月,第159-178页

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How do large multi-unit firms in a deconstructing world reconcile the conflicting forces of profits for today and flexibility to adapt for tomorrow? Profits for today requires order, control, and stability: adaptation for tomorrow requires flexibility and creativity in the value-added system. Large firms in many industries are confronted with this challenge of exploration and exploitation. In the European financial services industries these conflicting tendencies are increasingly obvious. Existing large financial players seem well placed to exploit the present but ill suited to adapt to the future. Why is this so, and what can be done about it? We consider the mechanisms of selection, adaptation and co-evolution that take place between levels within the firm and between the firm and its environment, and from this identify four ideal kinds of strategic renewal journeys that organizations can adopt as a way of coping with increasing environmental pressures. We label these journeys: emergent, directed, facilitated, and transformational. We show how these ideal types represent different options for top, middle and front-line managers, and we identify how each type differs in its capacity to cope with the changing environment. We illustrate our renewal journeys with examples from Dutch (MG and Rabobank) and British financials (Barclays, Lloyds and Prudential) and other organizations such as GE, IBM, Intel, Novotel and Philips. We suggest that for mobilising renewal in well-established financial institutions once protected but now exposed to the winds of change managers have to recognise that many of the current journeys are unsuitable for the future.
机译:在一个解构世界中的大型多部门公司如何协调今天的利益冲突力量和适应明天的灵活性?当今的利润需要秩序,控制和稳定性:适应明天需要增值系统具有灵活性和创造力。许多行业的大公司都面临着勘探和开发的挑战。在欧洲金融服务业中,这些相互矛盾的趋势越来越明显。现有的大型金融机构似乎有条件利用当前,但不适合适应未来。为什么会这样,该怎么办?我们考虑选择,适应和共同进化的机制,这些机制发生在公司内部各个级别之间以及公司与环境之间,并且由此确定了组织可以采用的四种理想的战略更新旅程,以应对增长的方式。环境压力。我们将这些旅程标记为:突发,定向,促进和转变。我们展示了这些理想的类型如何代表高层,中层和一线经理的不同选择,并且我们确定每种类型在应对不断变化的环境方面的能力如何不同。我们以荷兰(MG和荷兰合作银行)和英国金融公司(巴克莱,劳埃德和保诚)以及GE,IBM,英特尔,诺富特和飞利浦等其他组织为例来说明我们的续航之旅。我们建议,为了在曾经受到保护但现在正面临变革之风的成熟金融机构中动员更新,管理者必须认识到,当前的许多旅程都不适合未来。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Long Range Planning》 |2017年第1期|44-47|共4页
  • 作者

    Volberda Henk W.;

  • 作者单位

    Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号