首页> 外文期刊>Linguistic inquiry >A Lookahead Effect in Mbe Reduplication: Implications for Harmonic Serialism
【24h】

A Lookahead Effect in Mbe Reduplication: Implications for Harmonic Serialism

机译:MBE重新删除中的效果:对谐波连续主义的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Various phenomena involving the interaction of reduplication and phonology have been brought to bear on evaluating parallel versus serial theories of phonology. In Base-Reduplicant (BR) Correspondence Theory (McCarthy and Prince 1995), implemented in the classic parallel version of Optimality Theory (P-OT; Prince and Smolensky 1993/2004), the mapping from the underlying representation to the surface output is direct, without intermediate stages. In P-OT, the candidate-generating function GEN can simultaneously introduce multiple changes to the input. In contrast, the theory of Serial Template Satisfaction (STS; McCarthy, Kimper, and Mullin (MKM) 2012) is an approach to reduplication couched within Harmonic Serialism (McCarthy 2000 et seq.), a version of OT with serial evaluation that includes intermediate levels of structure. In Harmonic Serialism, GEN is restricted to making no more than one change at each derivational step, a property known as gradualness.An argument put forth in favor of STS is that it does not admit a number of reduplicative patterns that MKM claim are unattested, which are otherwise predicted by BR Correspondence Theory in P-OT (MKM 2012:225). Among these are patterns formerly interpreted as overapplication, backcopying, and underapplication. While such patterns previously served as arguments for BR Correspondence Theory (McCarthy and Prince 1995, 1999), MKM reexamine those cases and conclude that they do not provide solid evidence against a serial approach. Among the remaining patterns, coda-skipping reduplication and derivational lookahead appear to offer the strongest arguments in favor of STS. These are the two patterns for which the parallel and serial versions of OT make quite distinct predictions. However, recent studies have called the status of arguments involving both patterns into question. Zukoff (2017) shows that STS does not actually exclude coda-skipping reduplication, because certain mechanics that STS employs to account for attested partial onset skipping would predict coda skipping. Adler and Zymet (2017) identify a reduplication pattern in Maragoli that poses a type of lookahead problem for STS: the ordering of reduplication and hiatus-driven glide formation depends on lookahead to the surface form of the reduplicant, which favors a simple onset.In light of the ongoing discussion on these issues, this squib focuses on another kind of lookahead effect in reduplication where the amount of material copied would depend on a subsequent phonological change in the setting of a serial evaluation. Due to the stepwise gradual change in Harmonic Serialism, STS predicts that lookahead effects are not possible, while the potential for multiple, simultaneous changes in P-OT predicts that they exist. In this squib, we argue that a reduplicative affixation in Mbe instantiates a lookahead effect-specifically, one that closely resembles a hypothetical pattern that MKM identify as a problem for STS, were it to be attested. Furthermore, the variation in reduplicant size is arguably a case of "simple-syllable reduplication," a pattern claimed not to be predicted by STS. This reduplicative pattern in Mbe is straightforwardly accounted for in P-OT. However, in STS the pattern cannot be understood as a lookahead phenomenon, which gives rise to a treatment with unwanted stipulations and complications. We consider three alternatives in STS involving allomorphy or different templatic approaches, but find shortcomings in each.
机译:涉及重新删除和语音学相互作用的各种现象已经涉及评估并行与串行理论的语音学。在基础 - 重复(BR)对应理论(McCarthy和1995年王子)中,在优化理论的经典并行版本中实现(P-OT;王子和Smolensky 1993/2004),从底层表示到表面输出的映射是直接的,没有中间阶段。在P-OT中,候选生成函数Gen可以同时引入对输入的多个变化。相比之下,串行模板满意度理论(STS;麦卡什,蛋白壶和Mullin(MKM)2012)是一种可重新删除在谐波序列派(McCarthy 2000 et SEQ)内的重新删除方法,该版本的串行评估包括中间评估结构水平。在谐波连续主义中,Gen仅限于每个衍生步骤中的不超过一个变化,称为渐渐性的财产。提出STS的论证是它不承认MKM索赔未经证实的许多重新计算模式,在P-OT中的BR对应理论(MKM 2012:225)以其他方式预测。其中包括以前被解释为过度应用,反斜式和潜水的模式。虽然此前的这种模式作为BR对应理论的论据(McCarthy和1995,1999),MKM重新审视这些案件并得出结论,他们不提供针对串行方法的固体证据。在剩下的模式中,CoDa跳过重复和衍生神经护目理似乎提供了最强大的参数,支持STS。这些是SOT的并行和串行版本的两种模式。然而,最近的研究已经称为涉及这两个模式的论据的地位。 Zukoff(2017)表明,STS实际上并不排除CODA跳过重复,因为STS所采用的某些机制用于占证明的部分发作跳跃将预测CODA跳跃。 Adler和Zymet(2017)识别Maragoli中的重复模式,为STS带来了一种类型的寻示问题:重新删除和中断的滑动形成的排序取决于Lookahead到Reduplicant的表面形式,这有利于简单的onset.in在正在进行的讨论这些问题的光之光中,这种突击侧重于另一种在重新删除中的寻求效果,其中复制的材料量取决于随后的序列评估设置中的语音变化。由于谐波连续主义的逐步逐渐变化,STS预测了寻道效应是不可能的,而P-OT的多重同时变化的可能性是不可能的。在这个戒断中,我们认为,在MBE实例化的重复性附加物 - 具体而言,特别是一个与STS识别为STS的问题的假设模式。此外,重复尺寸的变化可以是“简单音节重复的情况”的情况,声称不被ST预测的模式。 MBE中的这种重新计算模式在P-OT中占据了直接占据。然而,在STS中,这种模式不能被理解为看法现象,这引起了不需要的规定和并发症的治疗。我们考虑涉及异形或不同的诱惑方法的STS中的三种替代方案,但发现了每个缺点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Linguistic inquiry》 |2020年第4期|845-859|共15页
  • 作者

    Wei Wei; Walker Rachel;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Southern Calif Los Angeles CA 90089 USA;

    Univ Southern Calif Los Angeles CA 90089 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号