首页> 外文期刊>Library Journal >ASPIRATION TO ACTION
【24h】

ASPIRATION TO ACTION

机译:渴望行动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

What Can we do? This has to be one of the most commonly asked questions in America-even before the recent presidential election brought a wave of hate crimes more pervasive than the one that followed the September 11 attacks. The ongoing impact of bigotry in America is, perhaps, the quintessential "wicked problem." A legacy of housing discrimination continues to shape neighborhoods-and how they are served by schools, police, and, yes, libraries-to this day. Studies continue to show implicit bias along lines of race and gender that impacts hiring, promotion, compensation, and retention-and explicit bias is still with us. All of these factors feed one another, eluding simple solutions to any that leave the others out of the equation. We don't claim that the initiatives that follow will allow the libraries that invented them, or their replicators, to solve racism, or transform what Alden E. Habacon calls "bento box diversity"-(mostly) peaceful coexistence of groups side by side but not a lot of interaction-into a truly equitable society.
机译:我们能做什么?这必须是美国最常见的问题之一,甚至在最近的总统大选之前,仇恨犯罪浪潮比9月11日袭击事件后的仇恨犯罪浪潮更普遍。在美国,偏执狂的持续影响也许是典型的“邪恶问题”。迄今为止,住房歧视的传统继续影响着社区,以及学校,警察和图书馆的服务方式。研究继续显示,种族,性别方面的隐性偏见会影响招聘,晋升,薪酬和留任率,而明确的偏见仍然存在。所有这些因素相互补充,为任何其他因素排除了简单的解决方案。我们并不是说以下举措将使发明它们的图书馆或其复制者能够解决种族主义,或改变奥尔登·哈巴康(Alden E. Habacon)所谓的“便当盒多样性” —(主要)群体和平共处但没有很多互动-成为一个真正公平的社会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Library Journal》 |2016年第20期|38-39|共2页
  • 作者

    Meredith Schwartz;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:17:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号