首页> 外文期刊>Law Library Journal >The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History
【24h】

The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History

机译:耶鲁法学院美国法律史研究指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

27 On paper, the pitch sounds nearly impossible: an affordable one-volume paperback reference that covers key research sources and techniques, spanning sixteenth century English legal principles to the present-day American legal system, suitable for audiences ranging from seasoned legal historians to novice interdisciplinary researchers. But that was the goal for Yale law librarians and research professors John B. Nann and the late Morris L. Cohen with The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History, the newest entry in the Yale Law Library Series in Legal History and Reference.28 The introduction acknowledges the dual (and, at times, dueling) audiences for a text like this: legal researchers and historians. Legal researchers likely have had more grounding in the modern American legal system, its core publications, and legal research basics, but may lack familiarity with the historical context and terminology necessary to research earlier eras. Conversely, historians may be better equipped to navigate obscure sources and formats but will be stymied without a basic understanding of the concept of stare decisis and the interplay between the courts, legislatures, and executive branch agencies in shaping the law. Readers from both categories will likely appreciate the introduction's six-step checklist for "Coordinating Historical Legal Research," which offers a handy framework for approaching any legal history research project.
机译:27从纸面上看,推销听起来几乎是不可能的:负担得起的单卷平装参考书涵盖了关键的研究来源和技术,涵盖了16世纪的英国法律原则到当今的美国法律体系,适用于从经验丰富的法律史学家到新手的读者跨学科研究人员。但这是耶鲁大学法律图书馆员和研究教授John B.Nann和已故的莫里斯·科恩(Morris L.Cohen)的目标,他们是《耶鲁大学法学院美国法律历史研究指南》,这是耶鲁大学法律历史和参考文献丛书中的最新条目.28引言承认这样的文本是双重的(有时是决斗的)读者:法律研究者和历史学家。法律研究人员可能在现代美国法律体系,其核心出版物和法律研究基础上有更多基础,但可能对研究早期时代所必需的历史背景和术语不熟悉。相反,历史学家也许能更好地导航模糊的来源和格式,但在缺乏对凝视决策概念以及法院,立法机关和行政部门机构在制定法律过程中的相互作用的基本了解的情况下,将陷入困境。这两类读者都可能会喜欢介绍的“协调历史法律研究”的六步清单,该清单为处理任何法律历史研究项目提供了方便的框架。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Law Library Journal》 |2019年第1期|152-154|共3页
  • 作者

    Jennifer L. Behrens;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 05:06:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号