...
首页> 外文期刊>Latin America Transactions, IEEE (Revista IEEE America Latina) >Field vs. Laboratory Usability Evaluations: a Study on a Context Dependent Mobile Application Developed with an Agile Methodology
【24h】

Field vs. Laboratory Usability Evaluations: a Study on a Context Dependent Mobile Application Developed with an Agile Methodology

机译:现场与实验室的可用性评估:使用敏捷方法开发的上下文相关移动应用程序的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How usability assessment of mobile interactive applications should be conducted in the frame of agile methodologies is an open question. On the one hand, usability evaluation consumes time and resources, which can make agile methodologies lose their agile essence. On the other hand, there is a considerable debate about whether user interactions with mobile systems should be investigated in the field or in more traditional laboratory environments. This work compares the results of a field study conducted in an interactive context-dependent mobile application with performed laboratory studies. This study has allowed identifying different interaction patterns and contextual factors not likely to be simulated in laboratory environment. Integrating field evaluations in agile methodologies is consistent with the objective of improving product quality through incremental assessments.
机译:如何在敏捷方法论框架内进行移动交互应用程序的可用性评估是一个悬而未决的问题。一方面,可用性评估会浪费时间和资源,这会使敏捷方法失去其敏捷本质。另一方面,关于是否应该在野外或更传统的实验室环境中研究与移动系统的用户交互问题,存在着很大的争议。这项工作将在交互式上下文相关的移动应用程序中进行的现场研究的结果与进行的实验室研究进行了比较。这项研究已经允许确定在实验室环境中不太可能模拟的不同交互模式和上下文因素。将现场评估整合到敏捷方法中,符合通过增量评估提高产品质量的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号