...
首页> 外文期刊>Landslides >Comparison of numerical models of two debris flows in the Cortina d’ Ampezzo area, Dolomites, Italy
【24h】

Comparison of numerical models of two debris flows in the Cortina d’ Ampezzo area, Dolomites, Italy

机译:意大利多洛米蒂山科尔蒂纳丹佩佐地区两种泥石流数值模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The accurate prediction of runout distances, velocities and the knowledge of flow rheology can reduce the casualties and property damage produced by debris flows, providing a means to delineate hazard areas, to estimate hazard intensities for input into risk studies and to provide parameters for the design of protective measures. The application of most of models that describe the propagation and deposition of debris flow requires detailed topography, rheological and hydrological data that are not always available for the debris-flow hazard delineation and estimation. In the Cortina d’Ampezzo area, Eastern Dolomites, Italy, most of the slope instabilities are represented by debris flows; 325 debris-flow prone watersheds have been mapped in the geomorphological hazard map of this area. We compared the results of simulations of two well-documented debris flows in the Cortina d’Ampezzo area, carried on with two different single-phase, non-Newtonian models, the one-dimensional DAN-W and the two-dimensional FLO-2D, to test the possibility to simulate the dynamic behaviour of a debris flow with a model using a limited range of input parameters. FLO-2D model creates a more accurate representation of the hazard area in terms of flooded area, but the results in terms of runout distances and deposits thickness are similar to DAN-W results. Using DAN-W, the most appropriate rheology to describe the debris-flow behaviour is the Voellmy model. When detailed topographical, rheological and hydrological data are not available, DAN-W, which requires less detailed data, is a valuable tool to predict debris-flow hazard. Parameters obtained through back-analysis with both models can be applied to predict hazard in other areas characterized by similar geology, morphology and climate.
机译:准确预测跳动距离,速度和流变学知识,可以减少泥石流造成的人员伤亡和财产损失,为划定危险区域,估算危险强度提供一种方法,以供输入风险研究并为设计提供参数保护措施。大多数描述泥石流传播和沉积的模型的应用都需要详细的地形,流变和水文数据,但这些数据并不总是可用于泥石流危害描述和估计。在意大利东部白云岩的科尔蒂纳丹佩佐地区,大多数坡度不稳定性都以泥石流为代表。在该地区的地貌灾害图上已绘制了325个易发生泥石流的流域。我们比较了在Cortina d'Ampezzo地区的两个有据可查的泥石流的模拟结果,并使用两种不同的单相非牛顿模型,即一维DAN-W和二维FLO-2D进行了模拟。 ,以测试使用有限输入参数范围的模型来模拟泥石流动态行为的可能性。 FLO-2D模型可以用淹水区域更准确地表示危险区域,但在跳动距离和沉积物厚度方面的结果与DAN-W结果相似。使用DAN-W,最能描述泥石流行为的流变学是Voellmy模型。当没有详细的地形,流变和水文数据时,需要较少详细数据的DAN-W是预测泥石流危害的有价值的工具。通过两个模型的反分析获得的参数可用于预测以相似的地质,形态和气候为特征的其他地区的灾害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号