...
首页> 外文期刊>Landscape and ecological engineering >Precipitation and mowing effects on highway rights-of-way vegetation height and safety
【24h】

Precipitation and mowing effects on highway rights-of-way vegetation height and safety

机译:降雨和割草对公路通行权植被高度和安全性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Managing highway rights-of-way (HROW) for safety depends upon the annual precipitation received and vegetation mowing practices. This study was conducted along a precipitation gradient in Texas, USA, to evaluate how precipitation and mowing treatments influence vegetation heights. The experiment was initiated in spring 1999 andcompleted in autumn 2002. Each site had ten treatments with four replications and consisted of forty 15 m × 6 m subplots. Commercial highway mowing equipment was used to mow the subplots at 5-, 10-, or 20-cm heights with an annual mowing frequency of one, two, or three times per year and a non-mowed control. A vegetation height of >30 cm is generally considered a safety hazard. Control subplot vegetation heights increased along the annual precipitation gradient. Most of the subplot vegetation heights at the more arid Andrews site (35 cm precipitation year~(-1)) were <30 cm. Subplot vegetation heights at the Tahoka (50 cm precipitation year~(-1)), Brady (66 cm precipitation year~(-1)), and Lufkin (109 cm precipitation year~(-1)) locations exceeded 30 cm, regardless of mowing frequency or height. Mowing treatments for HROW safety must be based on site-specific conditions. In areas that receive <35 cm precipitation year~(-1), mowing treatments have little effect on vegetation height, and management practices do not necessarily affect visual safety. In areas that receive >35 cm precipitation year~(-1), mowing three or less times per year, regardless of mowing height, makes it unfeasible to maintain the vegetation heights of <30 cm needed to maintain the HROW visual safety criterion.
机译:为了确保安全而管理高速公路通行权(HROW)取决于每年收到的降水量和植被修剪的做法。这项研究是沿着美国德克萨斯州的降水梯度进行的,目的是评估降水和割草处理如何影响植被高度。该实验于1999年春季开始,并于2002年秋季完成。每个站点进行十次处理,四次重复,由40个15 m×6 m的子图组成。使用商用高速公路割草设备在5、10或20厘米高的地方割草子样板,每年割草频率为每年一次,两次或三遍,并且没有割草的对照。植被高度> 30 cm通常被认为是安全隐患。控制子区的植被高度沿年降水量梯度增加。在更干旱的安德鲁斯站(降水年35 cm〜(-1))的大部分子图植被高度都小于30 cm。塔霍卡(50 cm降水年〜(-1)),布雷迪(66 cm降水年〜(-1))和鲁夫金(109 cm降水年〜(-1))的子图植被高度超过30 cm,无论修剪频率或高度。为保证HROW安全性而进行的割草处理必须基于特定地点的条件。在降水年<35 cm〜(-1)的地区,割草处理对植被高度影响很小,管理实践不一定会影响视觉安全。在年降水量大于(--1)大于35厘米的地区,无论割草高度如何,每年都要割草3次或以下,使得维持HROW视觉安全标准所需的植被高度<30厘米是不可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号