...
首页> 外文期刊>The Korean journal of chemical engineering >Comparison of electrodialysis and reverse electrodialysis processes in the removal of Cu(II) from dilute solutions
【24h】

Comparison of electrodialysis and reverse electrodialysis processes in the removal of Cu(II) from dilute solutions

机译:从稀溶液中去除Cu(II)的电渗析和反向电渗析过程的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Electrodialysis (ED) and electrodialysis reversal (EDR) processes have been often used for separation of ions in dilute solutions. In this study, the performance of ED and EDR processes has been examined in the removal of copper from the dilute solutions. First, applied voltage, initial concentration, flow rate, type of electrolyte and the effect of concentration were determined for both processes. Then, separation efficiency, current efficiency, energy requirement and material flux of the processes were calculated, and the performances of the processes were compared. The separation efficiency and energy consumption of EDR process were higher compared to ED process under equal operating conditions. Also, the current efficiency (39.58%) of EDR process was lower than the current efficiency (67.46%) of ED process. It can be said that the ED process is more suitable in terms of energy consumption for separation in the low flow rate and concentration.
机译:电渗析(ED)和电渗析逆转(EDR)工艺通常用于分离稀溶液中的离子。在这项研究中,ED和EDR工艺的性能已在从稀溶液中去除铜的过程中进行了检验。首先,确定两个过程的施加电压,初始浓度,流速,电解质类型和浓度影响。然后,计算了分离效率,电流效率,能量需求和材料通量,并比较了性能。在相同的操作条件下,EDR工艺的分离效率和能耗要高于ED工艺。另外,EDR工艺的电流效率(39.58%)低于ED工艺的电流效率(67.46%)。可以说,ED法在低流速和低浓度下分离所需的能量方面更合适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号