...
首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge Organization >Critical Organization of Knowledge in Mass Media Information Systems
【24h】

Critical Organization of Knowledge in Mass Media Information Systems

机译:大众媒体信息系统中的知识批判性组织

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper studies knowledge organization (KO) in media archives, focusing on the presence of subjectivity in the core tasks of mass media knowledge organizers (MKOS) dealing with press, radio and TV records, such as classification, representation, and any other process related to content analysis and organization in news information systems. Far from rejecting subjectivity and ideological bias in these operations - since they co-participate in the media construction of reality-the authors consider MKOS to be genuine ideological and cultural mediators with the right and social responsibility to explicitly state the results of their "objectifiable" work (obtained through KO protocols and procedures determined by the media/company, classifications, thesauri, ontologies, etc.) and differentiate them from those of their political, ideological, cultural and, in sum, subjective stances. In order to achieve this, we propose the application of critical operators that should be followed by technical, collaborative and even technological actions geared to investing information systems with the capacity to consider those stances and allowing users to distinguish them. In short, it is the theoretical recognition of the subjective and biased presence of media knowledge organization operators in a job that is usually considered neutral, banal and even objective, and the initial development of tools for critical, self-critical, technical, and technological training keyed to its practical solution. This paper outlines the lines of work of a broader research study on the critical function of KO in the field of global media memory.
机译:本文研究媒体档案中的知识组织(KO),重点研究在处理新闻,广播和电视记录(例如分类,表示和其他相关过程)的大众媒体知识组织者(MKOS)核心任务中主观性的存在新闻信息系统中的内容分析和组织。由于它们共同参与现实的媒体建设,因此他们并没有拒绝这些活动的主观性和意识形态偏见,他们认为MKOS是真正的意识形态和文化调解者,具有权利和社会责任明确陈述其“客观化”的结果。工作(通过媒体/公司确定的KO协议和程序,分类,叙词表,本体等获得),并将其与政治,意识形态,文化以及总的来说是主观立场区分开来。为了实现这一目标,我们建议应用关键操作员,随后应采取技术,协作甚至技术措施,以投资于信息系统并具有考虑这些立场并允许用户区别对待的能力。简而言之,这是对媒体知识组织运营商主观和偏见的理论认可,通常认为该工作是中立,平庸甚至客观的,并且是针对关键,自我批评,技术和技术的工具的初步开发针对其实际解决方案的培训。本文概述了有关KO在全球媒体存储领域中的关键功能的更广泛研究的工作思路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号