首页> 外文期刊>The Knowledge Engineering Review >Ontology engineering methodologies for the evolution of living and reused ontologies: status, trends, findings and recommendations
【24h】

Ontology engineering methodologies for the evolution of living and reused ontologies: status, trends, findings and recommendations

机译:本体工程方法,用于生活和重复使用的进化:地位,趋势,调查结果和建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this critical review paper is threefold: (a) to provide an insight on the impact of ontology engineering methodologies (OEMs) to the evolution of living and reused ontologies, (b) to update the ontology engineering (OE) community on the status and trends in OEMs and of their use in practice and (c) to propose a set of recommendations for working ontologists to consider during the life cycle of living, evolved and reused ontologies. The work outlined in this critical review paper has been motivated by the need to address critical issues on keeping ontologies alive and evolving while these are shared in wide communities. It is argued that the engineering of ontologies must follow a well-defined methodology, addressing practical aspects that would allow (sometimes wide) communities of experts and ontologists to reach consensus on developments and keep the evolution of ontologies 'in track'. In doing so, specific collaborative and iterative tool-supported tasks and phases within a complete and evaluated ontology life cycle are necessary. This way the engineered ontologies can be considered 'shared, commonly agreed and continuously evolved "live" conceptualizations' of domains of discourse. Today, in the era of Linked Data and Knowledge Graphs, it is more necessary than ever not to neglect to consider the recommendations that OEMs explicitly and implicitly introduce and their implications to the evolution of living ontologies. This paper reports on the status of OEMs, identifies trends and provides recommendations based on the findings of an analysis that concerns the impact of OEMs to the status of well-known, widely used and representative ontologies.
机译:本批评审查纸的目的是三倍:(a)对本体工程方法(OEM)对生活和重复使用的进化的影响,提供了洞察,以便更新本体工程(oe)社区OEM中的状态和趋势以及他们在实践中的使用和(c)提出了一系列关于工作本体主义者的建议,以考虑生活循环,进化和重复使用的本体。本批评审查文件中概述的工作是有必要解决在广泛社区中共享本体和不断发展的关键问题。有人认为,本体的工程必须遵循明确定义的方法,解决实际方面,这些方面允许(有时宽)专家和没有地理学家的社区达成共识,并保持在轨道上的内部系统的演变。在此过程中,必须在完整和评估的本体学生周期内完成特定的协作和迭代工具支持的任务和阶段。这样,工程化的本体可以被认为是“共享,常用的和不断发展的”讲座域的概念化“的”共同达成协议“。今天,在联系数据和知识图表中,比以往不要忽视的是,考虑明确隐含的建议并隐含地介绍的建议以及对生活本体演变的影响。本文报告了OEM的状况,确定了趋势,并根据涉及OEM对众所周知,广泛使用的和代表性本体的地位的影响,提供建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Knowledge Engineering Review》 |2020年第2020期|1-34|共34页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Aegean Dept Cultural Technol & Commun Intelligent Syst Lab Univ Hill Lesvos 81100 Greece|Univ Piraeus Dept Digital Syst AI Lab Gr Lampraki 126 Piraeus Greece;

    Univ Piraeus Dept Digital Syst AI Lab Gr Lampraki 126 Piraeus Greece;

    Univ Peloponnese Dept Informat & Telecommun Tripoli Greece;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:01:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号