首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge-Based Systems >A comparison on multi-class classification methods based on least squares twin support vector machine
【24h】

A comparison on multi-class classification methods based on least squares twin support vector machine

机译:基于最小二乘双支持向量机的多类分类方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Least Squares Twin Support Vector Machine (LSTSVM) is a binary classifier and the extension of it to multiclass is still an ongoing research issue. In this paper, we extended the formulation of binary LSTSVM classifier to multi-class by using the concepts such as "One-versus-All", "One-versus-One", "All-versus-One" and Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). This paper performs a comparative analysis of these multi-classifiers in terms of their advantages, disadvantages and computational complexity. The performance of all the four proposed classifiers has been validated on twelve benchmark datasets by using predictive accuracy and training testing time. All the proposed multi-classifiers have shown better performance as compared to the typical multi-classifiers based on 'Support Vector Machine' and 'Twin Support Vector Machine'. Friedman's statistic and Nemenyi post hoc tests are also used to test significance of predictive accuracy differences between classifiers. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:最小二乘双支持向量机(LSTSVM)是一个二进制分类器,并且将其扩展到多类仍然是一个持续的研究问题。在本文中,我们通过使用“一对多所有”,“一对多一个”,“所有多一个”和有向无环图等概念将二进制LSTSVM分类器的公式扩展为多类。 DAG)。本文对这些多分类器的优缺点和计算复杂度进行了比较分析。通过使用预测准确性和训练测试时间,已在十二个基准数据集上验证了所有四个提议的分类器的性能。与基于“支持向量机”和“双支持向量机”的典型多分类器相比,所有提出的多分类器均表现出更好的性能。 Friedman的统计量和Nemenyi事后检验也用于检验分类器之间预测准确性差异的显着性。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号