首页> 外文期刊>JPKE: Journal of Post Keynesian Economics >Historicizing the money of account: a critique of the nominalist ontology of money
【24h】

Historicizing the money of account: a critique of the nominalist ontology of money

机译:历史减少了账户金钱:批评名义上的金钱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The article puts forward a case against the nominalist ontology of money, that is, the heterodox notion that moneyness - the quality of being money - is conferred by the money of account. From the nominalist perspective, money is essentially a balance-sheet phenomenon: a credit-debit bookkeeping entity whose origins can be traced back to ancient Near Eastern practices of accounting. This ontological position, which is often erroneously traced back to Keynes'Treatise, mystifies and obscures the actual history of the money of account as a regime of monetary governance and a mode of speculation that only made sense in the European late medieval context of bimetallism. The article thus provides a critique of monetary nominalism based on Keynes' reflection on the value of money in theTreatiseand theGeneral Theory. In turn, it proceeds to historicize the phenomenon of the money of account, building on the seminal contributions of Marc Bloch and Luigi Einaudi.
机译:该文章提出了一个案件,抵御名义上的金钱本体,即杂散的概念,金钱 - 金钱的质量被账户资金赋予。从名义主义的角度来看,金钱基本上是一个资产负债表现象:信用借记簿记实体,其起源可以追溯到古代东部的会计实践。这种本体地位,这通常是错误地追溯到凯恩斯的“一轮”,默认,并掩盖了账户金钱的实际历史,作为货币治理的制度和猜测模式,只有在欧洲后期中世纪的双金属主义中世纪背景下只有意义。因此,这篇文章基于凯恩斯对金钱价值的思考,提供了对金钱标称主义的批判。反过来,它历史提出了占据账户资金的现象,建立了Marc Bloch和Luigi Einaudi的开创性贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号