...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world trade >Indonesia's Export Ban on Nickel Ore: Does It Violate the World Trade Organization (WTO) Rules?
【24h】

Indonesia's Export Ban on Nickel Ore: Does It Violate the World Trade Organization (WTO) Rules?

机译:印度尼西亚在镍矿的出口禁令:它是否违反了世界贸易组织(WTO)规则?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Many countries have imposed export restrictions based on economic and non-economic objectives. In 2020, Indonesia has followed this trend by imposing an export ban on nickel ore. The European Union reacted by launching a complaint at the WTO, claiming Indonesia's export ban has unfairly limited its producers' access to nickel. This article explores the way in which Indonesia could justify banning export on nickel ore, by looking at the current WTO rules and its judicial decisions. This article claims that Indonesia has no justification to impose this ban. Although it will most likely be temporarily applied, and be designed to prevent a critical shortage, nickel is not essential in Indonesia based on its domestic demand, ongoing plans, economic contribution, and the current mining law. Also, the ban will most likely not be justified based on general exception provisions under Article XX of the 1994.
机译:许多国家根据经济和非经济目标造成了出口限制。 2020年,印度尼西亚通过在镍矿上施加出口禁令遵循这种趋势。 欧洲联盟通过在WTO启动投诉作出反应,声称印度尼西亚的出口禁令不公平地限制生产者进入镍。 本文通过查看当前的WTO规则及其司法决策,探讨了印度尼西亚在镍矿上禁止出口的方式。 本文声称印度尼西亚对施加此禁令没有理由。 虽然它很可能会暂时应用,但旨在防止批判性短缺,镍基于国内需求,正在进行的计划,经济贡献和当前采矿法,镍不是印度尼西亚必不可少的。 此外,禁令将基于1994年第XX条的一般例外规定基于普通例外规定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号