首页> 外文期刊>Journal of World Investment & Trade; Law, Economics, Politics >Sanum Investments Limited v The Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic: PCA Case No. 2013-13, UNCITRAL Arbitration, Award on Jurisdiction, 13 December 2013 (Andres Rigo Sureda, Bernard Hanotiau, Brigitte Stern)
【24h】

Sanum Investments Limited v The Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic: PCA Case No. 2013-13, UNCITRAL Arbitration, Award on Jurisdiction, 13 December 2013 (Andres Rigo Sureda, Bernard Hanotiau, Brigitte Stern)

机译:Sanum Investments Limited诉老挝人民民主共和国政府:2013年13月PCA案,贸易法委员会仲裁,管辖权裁决,2013年12月13日(安德烈斯·里戈·苏雷达,伯纳德·哈诺蒂奥,布里吉特·斯特恩)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sanum Investments Limited (the Claimant or Sanum) - a company incorporated in Macao Special Administrative Region (SAR) - relied on the 1993 People's Republic of China (PRC or China)-Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR) bilateral investment treaty (the PRC-Laos BIT) to argue that its investments in Lao in the gambling and hospitality sector through a joint venture with a Laotian company were negatively affected by measures of the Laos government (the Respondent or Laos) which conducted itself in a way as to breach multiple obligations under the PRC-Laos BIT. The UNCITRAL tribunal (the Tribunal) in Sanum Investments v Lao PDR (Sanum) issued its Award on Jurisdiction (the Award) on 13 December 2013, finding that it had jurisdiction since, in application of the moving treaty frontiers principle, the PRC-Laos BIT applied also to Macao after its handover from Portugal to PRC in 1999. The Award was set aside by a judgment of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore (SGHC) on 20 January 2015. This case illustrates the application of general rules of State succession in respect to investment treaties in the specific context of Macao. The Sanum case, as discussed here, refers to the Award of the Tribunal and to the set aside proceedings before the SGHC.
机译:Sanum Investments Limited(索赔人或Sanum)-在澳门特别行政区(SAR)成立的公司-依靠1993年中华人民共和国(PRC或中国)-老挝人民民主共和国(PDR)双边投资条约(PRC-老挝BIT)辩称,通过与老挝公司合资成立的老挝在赌博和酒店业的投资受到老挝政府(被告或老挝)采取措施违反多项义务的措施的不利影响。根据老挝双边投资协定。贸易法委员会国际法庭在Sanum Investments诉Lao PDR(Sanum)一案中于2013年12月13日发布了司法管辖权裁决(该裁决),裁定它具有管辖权,因为根据移动条约边界原则,中华人民共和国-老挝BIT在澳门于1999年从葡萄牙移交给中国后也适用于澳门。该裁决是由新加坡共和国高等法院(SGHC)在2015年1月20日作出的判决中撤销的。该案说明了国家一般规则的适用澳门特定情况下投资条约的继承。此处讨论的Sanum案涉及法庭裁决和SGHC的搁置诉讼。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号