...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of water resource and protection >Comparative Evaluation of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Estimation of Missing Meteorological Variables over Ethiopia
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Estimation of Missing Meteorological Variables over Ethiopia

机译:估计埃塞俄比亚遗漏的气象变量的空间插值方法的比较评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In developing countries like Ethiopia where there is abundant water resources potential and also luck of reliable meteorological quality data, it expected to face the problem of missing meteorological data. Therefore, in conducting any water resources studies in any river basin for water resource project planning and management (like small scale irrigation), the first step before starting data analysis is to fill up the missing values of the meteorological variables (like rainfall, temperature, sunshine, wind speed etc.) which are required to start the study. One way of filling these missing variables is using datasets from other stations in the surrounding and applying appropriate spatial interpolation methods. A lot of studies have been conducted around the world to identify which method is the best to be applied to particular study area among the available spatial interpolation techniques. But when we come to Ethiopia, the study area, few or no studies are conducted to recommend the best performed method. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to conduct comparative evaluation of five interpolation techniques Nearest Neighbour (NN), Inverse Distance Weighting Average (IDWA), Modified Inverse Distance Weighting Average (MIDWA), Kriging Method (KM) and Thin Plate Spline (TPS) for estimation of four climatic variables (rainfall, mean temperature, wind speed and sunshine fraction) over complex topography of Ethiopia. Performance assessment is done using Mean Error (ME), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Relative Error (MRE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE); and the number of the meteorological stations selected for validation is ten (10) and these are distributed over the study area taking into account the variation of elevation ranging from 860 m (Awash) to 2420 m (Debremarkos) above sea level. The radial distances of 100 km and 200 km were selected and it was found that 100 km radial distance was not appropriate to compare all methods as some variables could not be estimated by KM and TPS. Therefore, 200 km was selected for further analysis and the result showed that NN, IDWA, and MIDWA were best methods relative to the remaining two methods (KM and TPS) for all variables and all stations except at Dire Dawa and Addis Ababa-Bole for estimation of wind speed using all methods except NN, and rainfall using TPS, respectively. Hence, NN, IDWA, and MIDWA methods could be used for estimation of missing meteorological variables over Ethiopia whenever necessary.
机译:在像埃塞俄比亚这样的发展中国家,那里有丰富的水资源潜力,而且运气可靠的气象质量数据也不佳,因此,它面临着缺少气象数据的问题。因此,在任何流域进行任何水资源研究以进行水资源项目的规划和管理(例如小规模灌溉)时,开始数据分析之前的第一步是要填补气象变量(例如降雨量,温度,阳光,风速等)。填充这些缺失变量的一种方法是使用周围其他站点的数据集并应用适当的空间插值方法。在世界范围内已经进行了许多研究,以确定在可用的空间插值技术中哪种方法最适用于特定研究区域。但是,当我们来到埃塞俄比亚研究区域时,很少或没有进行研究以推荐最佳执行方法。因此,本文的目的是对五种插值技术进行比较评估:最近邻(NN),反距离加权平均值(IDWA),修正的反距离加权平均值(MIDWA),克里格方法(KM)和薄板样条曲线(TPS) ),以估算埃塞俄比亚复杂地形上的四个气候变量(降雨,平均温度,风速和日照率)。使用平均误差(ME),平均绝对误差(MAE),平均相对误差(MRE)和均方根误差(RMSE)进行性能评估;选择进行验证的气象站数量为十(10),并且考虑到海拔高度从860 m(Awash)到2420 m(Debremarkos)的变化,这些气象站分布在研究区域中。选择了100 km和200 km的径向距离,发现100 km的径向距离不适用于比较所有方法,因为无法通过KM和TPS估计某些变量。因此,选择200 km进行进一步分析,结果表明,相对于其余两个方法(KM和TPS),除了Dire Dawa和Addis Ababa-Bole以外的所有变量和所有站点,NN,IDWA和MIDWA是最佳方法。使用NN以外的所有方法估算风速,使用TPS估算降雨量。因此,NN,IDWA和MIDWA方法可在必要时用于估计埃塞俄比亚缺失的气象变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号