首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research >Differences of precursory seismic energy release for the 2007 effusive dome-forming and 2014 Plinian eruptions at Kelud volcano, Indonesia
【24h】

Differences of precursory seismic energy release for the 2007 effusive dome-forming and 2014 Plinian eruptions at Kelud volcano, Indonesia

机译:印度尼西亚Kelud火山2007年喷发性穹顶形成和2014年Plinian爆发的前兆地震能量释放的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Early warnings of the timing, style, and size of volcanic eruptions, made on the basis of seismic monitoring, are important for mitigation of the hazards associated with volcanic eruptions. We calculated the rates of seismic energy release at Kelud volcano, Indonesia, preceding both the 2007 effusive lava-dome eruption and the 2014 Plinian eruption. For the 2007 eruption, there was first a step-wise increase in the rate of release of seismic energy, followed by a gradual decrease until the eruption. For the 2014 eruption, the rate of energy release was almost constant until 10 days before the eruption, then gradually increased until there was a dramatic acceleration during the last day before the eruption. The total seismic energy released by the 2007 and 2014 eruptions were 3 x 10(8)J, and 22 x 10(9)J, respectively. The relative difference between the ejected volumes of the 2007 and 2014 eruptions is roughly equivalent to that of the total seismic energy released preceding the eruptions. We conducted several trials of the material failure forecast method (FFM), applying it to the square root of the rate of seismic energy released, to assess its usefulness for predicting the timing of eruptions. The predicted onset of the 2007 eruption was one day earlier than the actual eruption and the seismic energy release preceding the actual eruption did not increase dramatically as suggested by the FFM model. Several trials of FFM for the 2014 eruption predicted the onset of the eruption to be three days to two weeks later than the actual eruption. Even as the end time of the FFM time window approaches several hours to 10 min before the actual eruption onset, the predicted eruption onset is still 3 h later than the actual onset. Thus, the results of our FFM modeling did not show the method to be useful for predicting eruption times for Kelud volcano. The differences of the FFM modeling results for the 2007 and 2014 eruptions likely reflect the differences in the rate of energy release immediately before the two eruptions: a deceleration before the 2007 eruption and an acceleration before the 2014 eruption. These differences may reflect differences in precursory processes for effusive lava-dome and Plinian eruptions. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V.
机译:在地震监测的基础上,对火山喷发的时间,样式和大小进行预警,对于减轻与火山喷发有关的危害非常重要。我们计算了印度尼西亚Kelud火山在2007年爆发的熔岩圆顶喷发和2014年Plinian喷发之前的地震能量释放速率。对于2007年的喷发,地震能量的释放速率首先逐步增加,然后逐渐减小直到喷发。对于2014年的喷发,直到喷发前10天,能量释放速率几乎保持恒定,然后逐渐增加,直到喷发前的最后一天急剧释放。 2007年和2014年喷发释放的总地震能量分别为3 x 10(8)J和22 x 10(9)J。 2007年和2014年喷发的射出量之间的相对差异大致等于喷发前释放的总地震能量的相对差异。我们对材料破坏预测方法(FFM)进行了多次试验,将其应用于释放的地震能量速率的平方根,以评估其对预测爆发时间的有用性。 2007年喷发的预计发作比实际喷发早了一天,而且实际喷发之前的地震能量释放并未像FFM模型所建议的那样急剧增加。 FFM针对2014年喷发的一些试验预测,喷发的发生比实际喷发晚三天到两周。即使FFM时间窗口的结束时间在实际爆发之前几小时到10分钟,预测的爆发仍比实际爆发晚3小时。因此,我们的FFM建模结果并未显示该方法可用于预测Kelud火山的喷发时间。 2007年和2014年喷发的FFM建模结果差异可能反映了两次喷发之前的能量释放速率差异:2007年喷发之前的减速和2014年喷发之前的加速。这些差异可能反映了喷发性熔岩穹顶和普林尼亚喷发的前兆过程的差异。 (C)2017爱思唯尔B.V.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号