...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research >Geological constraints on the eruption of the Jwaneng Centre kimberlite pipe, Botswana
【24h】

Geological constraints on the eruption of the Jwaneng Centre kimberlite pipe, Botswana

机译:博茨瓦纳Jwaneng中心金伯利岩管喷发的地质限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Geological mapping has allowed constraints to be placed on the eruption mechanisms involved in the formation of the Late Permian-Early Triassic Jwaneng Centre kimberlite pipe, Botswana. Twelve lithofacies and three lithofacies associations (LFA 1-3) are recognised. LFA 1 comprises massive to bedded volcaniclastic kimberlite and marginal shale breccias and outcrops over 65% of the surface area of the pipe. It is characterised by a lithic population dominated by Transvaal shale clasts. LFA 1 grades into LFA 2, which comprises massive and bedded volcaniclastic kimberlite and volcaniclastic breccias and outcrops over 19% of the surface area of the pipe. The lithic population of LFA 2 is dominated by contorted and fluidal-outlined Karoo-age mudstones and siltstones. LFA 3 comprises a wedge-shaped unit in the north of the pipe and consists of a series of allochthonous megablocks of sedimentary and volcaniclastic strata. The juvenile clast type and matrix mineral assemblages of the volcaniclastic deposits in the Centre Pipe differ from those in many other southern African kimberlite pipes. Various emplacement models for kimberlite pipes are discussed and evaluated in the light of the new geological data. Both a maar-diatreme model and an explosive volatile-driven eruption model could account for much of the geology of the Centre Pipe and distinguishing between the two models based on deposits alone is difficult. There is strong circumstantial evidence for ambient conditions favourable to phreatomagmatism at the time of the eruption, and the influence of external water may explain the differences between the Jwaneng Centre Pipe and the Class 1 kimberlites common across Southern Africa in terms of both the juvenile clasts and of the inter-clast cement. However, low abundances of some types of lithic inclusions derived from major country rock units pose an unresolved problem for a classic maar-diatreme model of pipe formation.
机译:地质制图已使对博茨瓦纳晚二叠纪-早三叠世Jwaneng中心金伯利岩管形成过程涉及的喷发机制施加了限制。公认有十二个岩相和三个岩相协会(LFA 1-3)。 LFA 1由块状到层状火山碎屑金伯利岩和边缘页岩角砾岩组成,露头占管道表面积的65%以上。它的特征是由德瓦瓦尔页岩碎屑为主的石器时代的人口。 LFA 1分为LFA 2,其中包括块状和层状火山碎屑金伯利岩和火山碎屑角砾岩,露头超过管道表面积的19%。 LFA 2的石块体以扭曲的和流体勾画的Karoo-age泥岩和粉砂岩为主。 LFA 3在管道的北部包含一个楔形单元,并由一系列沉积和火山碎屑层的异源巨型块组成。中心管中火山碎屑沉积物的幼裂类型和基质矿物组合与许多其他南部非洲金伯利岩管不同。根据新的地质数据,讨论并评估了金伯利岩管道的各种布置模型。 maar-dialtreme模型和爆炸性的挥发性驱动喷发模型都可以解释中心管道的大部分地质情况,仅凭沉积物来区分这两种模型很困难。有大量的环境证据表明火山喷发时周围环境有利于岩浆作用,而且外部水的影响可能解释了Jwaneng中心管和南部非洲常见的1级金伯利岩在幼虫碎屑和碎屑方面的差异。间的水泥。然而,对于主要的岩浆渗流模型,来自主要乡村岩石单元的某些类型的岩性夹杂物含量低,构成了一个尚未解决的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号