首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research >Variations in population exposure and sensitivity to lahar hazards from Mount Rainier, Washington
【24h】

Variations in population exposure and sensitivity to lahar hazards from Mount Rainier, Washington

机译:来自华盛顿雷尼尔山的人口暴露水平和对拉哈尔灾害的敏感性的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although much has been done to understand, quantify, and delineate volcanic hazards, there are fewer efforts to assess societal vulnerability to these hazards, particularly demographic differences in exposed populations or spatial variations in exposure to regional hazards. To better understand population diversity in volcanic hazard zones, we assess the number and types of people in a single type of hazard zone (lahars) for 27 communities downstream of Mount Rainier, Washington (USA). Using various socioeconomic and hazard datasets, we estimate that there are more than 78000 residents, 59000 employees, several dependent-population facilities (e.g., child-day-care centers, nursing homes) and numerous public venues (e.g., churches, hotels, museums) in a Mount Rainier lahar-hazard zone. We find that communities vary in the primary category of individuals in lahar-prone areas-exposed populations are dominated by residents in some communities (e.g., Auburn), employees in others (e.g., Tacoma), and tourists likely outnumber both of these groups in yet other areas (e.g., unincorporated Lewis County). Population exposure to potential lahar inundation varies considerably-some communities (e.g., Auburn) have large numbers of people but low percentages of them in hazard zones, whereas others (e.g., Orting) have fewer people but they comprise the majority of a community. A composite lahar-exposure index is developed to help emergency managers understand spatial variations in community exposure to lahars and results suggest that Puyallup has the highest combination of high numbers and percentages of people and assets in lahar-prone areas. Risk education and preparedness needs will vary based on who is threatened by future lahars, such as residents, employees, tourists at a public venue, or special-needs populations at a dependent-care facility. Emergency managers must first understand the people whom they are trying to prepare before they can expect these people to take protective measures after recognizing natural cues or receiving an official lahar warning.
机译:尽管已经做了很多工作来理解,量化和描述火山灾害,但很少有工作评估社会对这些灾害的脆弱性,尤其是暴露人群的人口差异或暴露于区域灾害的空间差异。为了更好地了解火山灾害带中的人口多样性,我们评估了华盛顿(美国)雷尼尔山下游的27个社区在单一灾害带(lahars)中的人数和类型。使用各种社会经济和灾害数据集,我们估计有超过78000名居民,59000名员工,数个受养人口设施(例如,儿童日托中心,疗养院)和众多公共场所(例如教堂,酒店,博物馆) )位于雷尼尔山的拉哈尔危险区域。我们发现,在易发生哈拉地区的人群中,社区的主要类别有所不同,在某些社区(例如,Auburn)中的居民占主导地位,在其他社区(例如,塔科马)中的雇员占主导地位,而游客在这些社区中的人数可能超过这两个群体。其他地区(例如,未注册成立的刘易斯县)。人口可能遭受拉哈尔洪水的影响千差万别-一些社区(例如Auburn)人口众多,但在危险地带的人口比例较低,而其他社区(例如Orting)的人口较少,但它们构成社区的大部分。制定了综合的拉哈暴露指数,以帮助应急管理人员了解社区对拉哈斯的接触的空间变化,结果表明,普耶洛普在易拉哈地区的人口和资产比例高,比例最高。风险教育和备灾需求的变化取决于未来居民所面临的威胁,例如居民,员工,公共场所的游客或受抚养机构中的特殊需求人群。紧急事件管理人员必须首先了解他们正在准备的人,然后才能期望这些人在认识到自然线索或收到正式的lahar警告后采取保护措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号