...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of urbanism >Thinking against Heritage: speculative development and emancipatory politics in the City of London
【24h】

Thinking against Heritage: speculative development and emancipatory politics in the City of London

机译:反对遗产的思考:伦敦金融城的投机发展与解放政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

What does a political conceptualisation of the relationship between urban development and heritage involve? Against the widespread idea that there is a conflict between densification and the protection of historic buildings and sites in the City of London, I show that a conservative heritage discourse promotes the construction of speculative towers. Arguing against a City that is privately owned, self-competing and socially homogeneous, I develop a democratic understanding of history that contests an essentialist reading of the city and challenges the idea that speculative developments direct attention to and visually enhance historic landmarks. Aligning historical analysis with political critique, I draw on the work of Walter Benjamin and Michel Foucault and discuss notions of "historical events" and "cultural treasures" in order to think against the prevailing speculative logic in the city.
机译:关于城市发展与遗产之间关系的政治概念化涉及什么?反对普遍的观念,即致密化与伦敦市历史建筑和遗址的保护之间存在冲突,我表明,保守的遗产论述促进了投机塔的建造。我与一个私有,自我竞争和社会同质的城市争论,我发展了对历史的民主理解,使人们对城市的本质主义者的看法产生了挑战,并挑战了投机性发展直接关注并视觉化历史地标的观点。为了将历史分析与政治评论相结合,我借鉴了沃尔特·本杰明(Walter Benjamin)和米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)的著作,并讨论了“历史事件”和“文化宝藏”的概念,以便与城市中普遍存在的投机逻辑相冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号