...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transportation Security >A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures
【24h】

A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures

机译:美国航空保安措施的风险和成本效益评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper seeks to discover whether aviation security measures are cost-effective by considering their effectiveness, their cost and expected lives saved as a result of such expenditure. An assessment of the Federal Air Marshal Service suggests that the annual cost is $180 million per life saved. This is greatly in excess of the regulatory safety goal (societal willingness to pay to save a life) of $1–$10 million per life saved. As such, the air marshal program fails a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the opportunity cost of these expenditures is considerable, and it is highly likely that far more lives would have been saved if the money had been invested instead in a wide range of more cost-effective risk mitigation programs. On the other hand, hardening of cockpit doors has an annual cost of only $800,00 per life saved, showing that this is a cost-effective security measure.
机译:本文旨在通过考虑航空保安措施的有效性,成本以及由此产生的预期寿命来发现航空保安措施是否具有成本效益。联邦航空元帅局的评估表明,每挽救一条生命每年可节省1.8亿美元。这大大超过了每条挽救生命的1–1000万美元的监管安全目标(社会愿意为挽救生命而付出的意愿)。因此,空军元帅计划未能进行成本效益分析。此外,这些支出的机会成本相当可观,如果将这些钱投入到一系列更具成本效益的风险缓解计划中,则很有可能挽救更多的生命。另一方面,对驾驶舱门进行硬化处理,每挽救一条生命每年的成本仅为800,00美元,这表明这是一种具有成本效益的安全措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号