首页> 外文期刊>Journal of transportation management >DRUG TESTING IN THE U.S. TRUCKING INDUSTRY: HAIR VS. URINE SAMPLES AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND THE INDUSTRY
【24h】

DRUG TESTING IN THE U.S. TRUCKING INDUSTRY: HAIR VS. URINE SAMPLES AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND THE INDUSTRY

机译:美国货运业中的药物检测:头发与尿样和政策和行业的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Virtually everything we own was transported by truck at some point. Around 3.5 million truck drivers haul almost 71% of U.S. freight. To ensure the safety of our roadways, the U.S. government requires all drivers to pass urinalysis drug screens. However, urinalysis drug screens are easily thwarted and some trucking companies use hair drug screens, a more stringent test. This research examines trucking industry data and finds about 300,000 truck drivers would be removed from their positions if forced to pass a hair drug test. Hair testing opponents argue that the test is biased against ethnic minority groups. Comparing urine and hair pass/fail rates for various ethnic groups, our results indicate ethnic groups are significantly different irrespective of testing procedure. Factors other than testing method seem to underlie ethnic group pass/fail rate differences.
机译:几乎我们拥有的一切都在某些时候被卡车运送。大约350万卡车司机占美国货物的近71%。为了确保我们的道路安全,美国政府要求所有司机通过尿液药物屏幕。然而,尿液分析药物屏幕很容易突然挫败,一些货运公司使用头发药物屏幕,更严格的测试。该研究审查了卡车运输行业数据,发现如果被迫通过头发药物测试,可以从其职位中取出约300,000个卡车司机。头发测试对手认为测试是针对少数民族群体的偏见。与各种民族的尿液和发束/失败率进行比较,我们的结果表明,无论检测程序如何,族群都显着不同。除了测试方法以外的因素似乎是族裔群体通过/失败率差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号