首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transportation Engineering >Evaluation of Transition Methods of the 170E and 2070 ATC Traffic Controllers after Emergency Vehicle Preemption
【24h】

Evaluation of Transition Methods of the 170E and 2070 ATC Traffic Controllers after Emergency Vehicle Preemption

机译:抢先应急车辆后170E和2070 ATC交通管制员过渡方法的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Modern traffic signal control systems provide emergency vehicle preemption (EVP) capabilities using advanced sensors and communication technologies. While EVP strategies have been widely implemented by urban transportation management agencies, few research efforts have studied the transition methods employed after EVP operations. This paper presents comprehensive evaluations of EVP transition operations, considering both exit phase control and transition methods under three different traffic volume conditions. The research employed hardware-in-the-loop simulation, which provides a more realistic evaluation environment because it incorporates actual signal controllers into the simulation. The evaluation results at a coordinated-actuated signalized intersections in Northern Virginia indicated that: (1) performance measures varied significantly depending on the EVP transition methods; (2) shortway in the 170E controller and smooth in the 2070 ATC controller generally outperformed the other transition methods; and (3) the use of exit phases-available in the 2070 ATC controller-provided significant benefits over the 170E controller.
机译:现代交通信号控制系统使用先进的传感器和通信技术提供紧急车辆抢占(EVP)功能。尽管城市交通管理机构已广泛实施EVP策略,但很少有研究工作研究过EVP运营后采用的过渡方法。本文介绍了EVP过渡操作的综合评估,同时考虑了三种不同交通量条件下的出口阶段控制和过渡方法。该研究采用了硬件在环仿真,它提供了一个更现实的评估环境,因为它将实际的信号控制器集成到了仿真中。在北弗吉尼亚州的一个协调驱动的信号交叉口的评估结果表明:(1)根据EVP转换方法,性能指标差异很大; (2)170E控制器的短程运行和2070 ATC控制器的平稳运行总体上优于其他过渡方法; (3)使用2070 ATC控制器中提供的退出阶段相对于170E控制器具有明显的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号