...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Transport History >Southampton to Durban on the Union Castle Line: An Imperial Shipping Company and the limits of globality c. 1900-39
【24h】

Southampton to Durban on the Union Castle Line: An Imperial Shipping Company and the limits of globality c. 1900-39

机译:联合城堡线上的南安普敦至德班:帝国航运公司和全球化的局限性c。 1900-39

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the relationship between Durban and Southampton constructed by the Union Castle Line between 1900 and the 1930s. It shows how specific, long-lasting patterns of commercial organisation and labour recruitment were laid down, and how they survived the contingencies of war, working class insurgency and financial crisis. The article proposes the concepts of 'maritime capital field' and 'maritime labour field' to describe the long-lasting shapes which transnational structural relationships gave to imperial shipping enterprises. A critique is made of the work of Michael Miller on European shipping companies in this period: the article demonstrates that the Union Castle case challenges both Miller's emphasis on an expansive globalisation and his emphasis on the cosmopolitanism of the shipping industry. Political and social closures and limitations were characteristic of the relations between the two ports. Restrictive forms of political, ideological and military power within the British Empire played a great role in structuring the connections between Durban and Southampton.
机译:本文考察了由联合城堡线在1900年至1930年代建造的德班和南安普敦之间的关系。它显示了如何制定具体,持久的商业组织和劳动力招聘模式,以及它们如何在战争,工人阶级叛乱和金融危机等突发事件中幸免。本文提出“海上资本领域”和“海上劳动力领域”的概念,以描述跨国结构关系对帝国航运企业的长期影响。对迈克尔·米勒(Michael Miller)在此期间对欧洲船运公司的工作提出了批评:该文章表明,联合城堡案挑战了米勒对扩张的全球化的强调和对航运业世界主义的强调。政治和社会封锁与限制是这两个港口之间关系的特征。大英帝国内部的限制性政治,思想和军事力量在建立德班和南安普敦之间的联系方面发挥了重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号