首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transport Geography >The potential economic viability of using the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe
【24h】

The potential economic viability of using the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe

机译:使用北海航线(NSR)作为亚洲和欧洲之间的替代航线的潜在经济可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Arctic Ocean has been greatly affected by climate change. Future predications show an even more drastic reduction of the ice cap which will open new areas for the exploration of natural resources and maritime transportation. Shipping through the Arctic Ocean via the Northern Sea Route (NSR) could save about 40% of the sailing distance from Asia (Yokohama) to Europe (Rotterdam) compared to the traditional route via the Suez Canal. However, a 40% reduction in distance using the NSR does not mean a corresponding 40% in cost savings due to many factors, including: higher building costs for ice-classed ships, non-regularity and slower speeds, navigation difficulties and greater risks, as well as the need for extra ice breaker service.rnThe main purpose of this study is to investigate the economic potential of using the NSR as an alternative route between Asia and Europe by taking all the main factors into consideration. It focuses on economic aspect of the NSR, therefore navigation/ environmental/cultural/legal issues are not discussed.rnThe economic study is conducted by a case study in which 4300 TEU container ships (both non-ice classed and ice classed) are employed to make year round service. The annual profit gained from regular service by a non-ice-classed ship via the Suez Canal for the entire year is compared to the annual profit gained from an ice-classed ship taking the NSR during the navigable months and Suez Canal for the rest of the year. There are three factors that influence the NSR the most: the navigable time of the NSR, Russian NSR fees and bunker prices. To make this study flexible, three scenarios for navigable time, three scenarios for Russian NSR fees as well as three scenarios for bunker prices are proposed. These assumptions are all combined with each other and the profit under each condition is then calculated. The overall comparison is made in order to see under which conditions the NSR is competitive with the Suez Canal.
机译:北冰洋受到气候变化的极大影响。未来的预测表明,冰帽的减少甚至更大,这将为探索自然资源和海上运输开辟新的领域。与通过苏伊士运河的传统航线相比,通过北海航线(NSR)通过北冰洋运输可以节省从亚洲(横滨)到欧洲(鹿特丹)的航行距离约40%。但是,由于许多因素,使用NSR将距离减少40%并不意味着相应地节省了40%的成本,其中包括:冰级船舶的建造成本较高,不规则和速度较慢,航行困难以及更大的风险,这项研究的主要目的是通过考虑所有主要因素,研究将NSR用作亚洲和欧洲之间替代路线的经济潜力。它着重于NSR的经济方面,因此未讨论航行/环境/文化/法律问题。rnn进行了一项经济研究,其中以4300 TEU集装箱船(非冰级和冰级)为例进行了研究。提供全年服务。非冰级船通过苏伊士运河通过常规服务获得的全年全年利润,与在通航月份中采用NSR的冰级船从苏伊士运河获得的年度利润进行了比较。那一年。影响NSR的三个因素最多:NSR的航行时间,俄罗斯的NSR费用和燃油价格。为了使这项研究更加灵活,提出了三种可通航时间的方案,三种针对俄罗斯NSR费用的方案以及三种用于燃油价格的方案。这些假设相互结合,然后计算每种条件下的利润。进行总体比较是为了了解NSR在何种条件下与苏伊士运河竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号