首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transport Geography >Delivery to homes or collection points? A sustainability analysis for urban, urbanised and rural areas in Belgium
【24h】

Delivery to homes or collection points? A sustainability analysis for urban, urbanised and rural areas in Belgium

机译:交付给房屋或收集点? 比利时城市,城市化和农村地区的可持续发展分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

E-commerce is a rapidly growing and evolving sector. The sector is however struggling with organising its last mile deliveries in order to meet the sustainability requirements, both economically and environmentally. Multiple studies have compared deliveries to collection points with deliveries to residential home addresses in sustainability terms. The variety in results indicates that these studies are bound to local parameters (such as regulations, drop densities, collection point networks). Consequently, their results cannot be generalised or transferred to other contexts. In this research, we compare deliveries to stores serving as collection points and homes for online ordered non-food products in Belgium. The solutions are simulated with agent-based transport model TRABAM. The results are evaluated based on their generated external costs and differentiated according to three area types: urban, urbanised and rural areas. Considering the case-specific density of the collection points, the results indicate that home deliveries are preferred in rural and urbanised areas when considering the sustainability impact solely. In urban areas, collection point deliveries are more sustainable.
机译:电子商务是一种迅速增长和不断发展的部门。然而,该部门正在努力组织其最后一英里交付,以满足经济和环境的可持续性要求。多项研究将交付与可持续性术语的住宅家庭地址交付的收集点进行比较。结果中的多样性表明这些研究涉及局部参数(例如法规,丢弃密度,收集点网络)。因此,它们的结果不能推广或转移到其他环境中。在这项研究中,我们将交付给储存作为比利时在线订购的非食品的收集点和家庭。用基于代理的运输模型Trabam模拟解决方案。结果根据其产生的外部成本进行评估,并根据三种地区类型进行差异:城市,城市化和农村地区。考虑到收集点的具体情况,结果表明,在考虑可持续性的影响时,在农村和城市化区域中,家庭交付是首选。在城市地区,收集点交付更可持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号