首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer >Laser-Induced Fluorescence Measurements of Atomic Oxygen Using Two Calibration Methods
【24h】

Laser-Induced Fluorescence Measurements of Atomic Oxygen Using Two Calibration Methods

机译:使用两种校准方法的激光诱导原子氧荧光测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Number densities of atomic oxygen have been measured in pure oxygen plasma, using two-photon laser-induced fluorescence measurements. In this paper, two calibration techniques are compared: the sensitivity of the experimental setup is calibrated using scattering experiments, and reference measurements on xenon are performed using two-photon laser-induced fluorescence measurements. The theoretical background and the experimental setup are described in detail. The advantages and drawbacks are herewith outlined. Applied to high-enthalpy, pure oxygen plasma, the evaluated number densities show fairly good agreement; however, because a constant discrepancy is measured between the results when using the two calibration approaches, a systematic error is probable. Possible reasons for this error are discussed (e.g., the cross-sectional ratio, in the case of xenon reference measurement calibration). One main conclusion is that measurements that are performed using the reference measurements on xenon are preferred, because they have much fewer experimental factors to be taken into account.
机译:使用两光子激光诱导的荧光测量,已经在纯氧等离子体中测量了原子氧的原子数密度。在本文中,比较了两种校准技术:使用散射实验对实验装置的灵敏度进行校准,并使用双光子激光诱导的荧光测量对氙进行参考测量。详细介绍了理论背景和实验设置。在此概述了优点和缺点。应用于高焓纯氧等离子体,评估的数密度显示出相当好的一致性;但是,由于在使用两种校准方法时,测量结果之间存在恒定差异,因此可能会出现系统误差。讨论了可能导致此错误的原因(例如,在氙气基准测量校准的情况下,横截面积比)。一个主要结论是,使用氙气的参考测量值进行测量是优选的,因为它们需要考虑的实验因素要少得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号