...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology >Automatic Multidocument Summarization of Research Abstracts: Design and User Evaluation
【24h】

Automatic Multidocument Summarization of Research Abstracts: Design and User Evaluation

机译:研究摘要的自动多文档摘要:设计和用户评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to develop a method for automatic construction of multidocument summaries of sets of research abstracts that may be retrieved by a digital library or search engine in response to a user query. Sociology dissertation abstracts were selected as the sample domain in this study. A variable-based framework was proposed for integrating and organizing research concepts and relationships as well as research methods and contextual relations extracted from different dissertation abstracts. Based on the framework, a new summarization method was developed, which parses the discourse structure of abstracts, extracts research concepts and relationships, integrates the information across different abstracts, and organizes and presents them in a Web-based interface. The focus of this article is on the user evaluation that was performed to assess the overall quality and usefulness of the summaries. Two types of variable-based summaries generated using the summarization method-with or without the use of a taxonomy-were compared against a sentence-based summary that lists only the research-objective sentences extracted from each abstract and another sentence-based summary generated using the MEAD system that extracts important sentences. The evaluation results indicate that the majority of sociological researchers (70%) and general users (64%) preferred the variable-based summaries generated with the use of the taxonomy.
机译:这项研究的目的是开发一种自动构建研究摘要集的多文档摘要的方法,可以由数字图书馆或搜索引擎响应用户查询来检索这些摘要。本研究选择社会学论文摘要作为样本领域。提出了一个基于变量的框架,用于整合和组织研究概念和关系以及从不同论文摘要中提取的研究方法和上下文关系。在该框架的基础上,开发了一种新的摘要方法,该方法可以分析摘要的话语结构,提取研究概念和关系,将不同摘要之间的信息进行集成,并在基于Web的界面中进行组织和呈现。本文的重点是进行用户评估,以评估摘要的整体质量和实用性。将使用摘要方法生成的两种类型的基于变量的摘要(使用或不使用分类法)与基于句子的摘要(仅列出从每个摘要中提取的研究目标性句子)和使用基于文本的另一摘要(使用分类法)进行比较。提取重要句子的MEAD系统。评估结果表明,大多数社会学研究人员(70%)和普通用户(64%)更喜欢使用分类法生成基于变量的摘要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号