首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology >Reports, Requests, And Recipient Design: The Management Of Patron Queries In Online Reference Chats
【24h】

Reports, Requests, And Recipient Design: The Management Of Patron Queries In Online Reference Chats

机译:报告,请求和收件人设计:在线参考聊天中的顾客查询管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The related fields of ethnomethodology (EM), founded by Harold Garfinkel, and conversation analysis (CA), as epitomized by the work of Harvey Sacks, offer unique insights into the operation of virtual reference services (VRS).The tradition of phenomenology within library and information science (LIS) provides a context for this research, although EM/CA differs in important respects, providing a program for grounded empirical investigations. Relevant EM/CA research concerns include the documentary method of interpretation, trust, indexicality, instructed action, and sequential organization. Review of the LIS literature on reference interactions in both face-to-face and virtual settings reveals a tendency to impose analytic categories and classificatory schemes that obscure the extremely situated and collaborative nature of reference work; however, an EM/CA examination of transcripts from the first 4 months of a newly implemented VRS at a large university library suggests the need for a more nuanced approach. Close-order examination of two chat reference transcripts reveals the interactional complexities and nuances that characterize even the most succinct encounters. Analyzing the reference query as a service request demonstrates how librarians deploy their interactional skills to address "face" concerns and ameliorate potentially problematic aspects of the reference encounter.
机译:哈罗德·加芬克尔(Harold Garfinkel)创立的民族方法论(EM)和对话分析(CA)的相关领域,以哈维·萨克斯(Harvey Sacks)的工作为代表,对虚拟参考服务(VRS)的运作提供了独特的见解。尽管EM / CA在重要方面有所不同,但信息科学(LIS)为这项研究提供了背景,为扎实的实证研究提供了一个程序。 EM / CA相关的研究关注点包括解释,信任,索引性,指示性操作和顺序组织的记录方法。对LIS文献的面对面和虚拟环境中的参考相互作用的回顾表明,倾向于强加分析类别和分类方案,这掩盖了参考工作的极端定位和协作性质;但是,对大型大学图书馆新实施的VRS的前四个月的成绩单进行EM / CA审查表明,需要采用更细微的方法。对两个聊天参考笔录的近距离检查揭示了即使是最简洁的相遇,也具有交互的复杂性和细微差别。将参考查询作为服务请求进行分析表明,图书馆员如何利用他们的交互技能来解决“面部”问题并改善参考遇到的潜在问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号