首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology >The Effects of Research Resources on International Collaboration in the Astronomy Community
【24h】

The Effects of Research Resources on International Collaboration in the Astronomy Community

机译:研究资源对天文学界国际合作的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study examines whether an institution's research resources affect its centrality and relationships in international collaboration among 606 astronomical institutions worldwide. The findings support our theoretical hypotheses that an institution's research resources are positively related to its central position in the network. Astronomical institutions with superior resources, such as being equipped with international observational facilities and having substantial research manpower, tend to have more foreign partners (high degree centrality) and play an influential role (high betweenness centrality) in the international collaboration network. An institution becomes more and more active in international collaborations as its research population expands. In terms of the relationship, which is captured by an actor institution's co-authorship preference for each partner in the network, the effect of research resources is not as significant as expected. We found that astronomical institutions are not necessarily preferentially co-authoring with partners that have better research resources. In addition, this study indicates that geographic closeness (or "geographic proximity") largely affects the occurrence of international collaboration. The investigated institutions apparently prefer partners from neighboring countries. This finding gives an indication of the phenomenon of "regional homophily" in the international collaboration network.
机译:这项研究检查了一个机构的研究资源是否会影响其在全球606个天文机构之间的国际合作中的中心性和关系。这些发现支持了我们的理论假设,即机构的研究资源与其在网络中的中心地位正相关。配备国际观测设施并拥有大量研究人力的资源丰富的天文机构往往拥有更多的外国伙伴(高度集中性),并在国际合作网络中发挥影响力(高度中间性)。随着研究人口的增加,一个机构在国际合作中变得越来越活跃。就关系而言,行为者机构对网络中每个合作伙伴的共同作者偏好都体现了这种关系,研究资源的影响并不像预期的那么重要。我们发现,天文学机构不一定会优先与拥有更好研究资源的合作伙伴共同创作。另外,这项研究表明,地理上的亲密性(或“地理上的亲近性”)在很大程度上影响了国际合作的发生。被调查的机构显然更喜欢邻国的伙伴。这一发现表明了国际合作网络中“区域同质”现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号