首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology >Social Media and Problematic Everyday Life Information-Seeking Outcomes: Differences Across Use Frequency, Gender, and Problem-Solving Styles
【24h】

Social Media and Problematic Everyday Life Information-Seeking Outcomes: Differences Across Use Frequency, Gender, and Problem-Solving Styles

机译:社交媒体和有问题的日常生活寻求信息的结果:使用频率,性别和解决问题方式的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social media offers both opportunities and challenges in everyday life information seeking (ELIS). Despite their popularity, it is unclear whether the use of social media for ELIS heightens problematic outcomes, such as encountering too much information and finding irrelevant, conflicting, outdated, and noncredible information. In light of this gap, this study tested (a) whether the level of problematic informational outcomes varies with the use of social networking sites, microblogs, and social question and answer sites; (b) whether the problem level varies by gender and problem-solving styles; and (c) whether the aforementioned factors have significant interaction effects. An online questionnaire was used to survey 791 U.S. undergraduates. Irrelevant information was the top issue. Gender difference was statistically significant for conflicting information, which was more problematic for women. The multiway analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated notable problem-solving style differences, especially on the Personal Control subscale. This highlights the importance of affective factors. It is noteworthy that although social media use has no significant main effect, there were significant interaction effects between microblog use and the Approach-Avoidance and Problem Solving Confidence subscales. The impact of microblog use on ELIS outcomes therefore warrants further investigation. Five propositions are posited for further testing.
机译:社交媒体在日常生活信息搜索(ELIS)中既提供机遇,也带来挑战。尽管流行,但尚不清楚使用社交媒体进行ELIS是否会增加问题的结果,例如遇到太多信息并发现无关,冲突,过时和不可信赖的信息。鉴于这一差距,本研究测试了(a)信息性结果问题的水平是否随社交网站,微博和社交问答网站的使用而变化; (b)问题的水平是否因性别和解决问题的方式而异; (c)上述因素是否有重大的相互作用作用。使用在线问卷调查了791名美国大学生。无关的信息是头号问题。性别差异在信息冲突方面具有统计学意义,对女性而言更成问题。方差的多方分析(ANOVA)显示出显着的问题解决风格差异,尤其是在Personal Control子量表上。这突出了情感因素的重要性。值得注意的是,尽管社交媒体的使用没有显着的主要影响,但微博的使用与避免和解决问题信心量表之间存在显着的交互作用。因此,微博使用对ELIS结果的影响值得进一步研究。提出了五个命题,以进行进一步的测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号