首页> 外文期刊>The journal of technology transfer >Tax incentives for innovation: time to restructure the R&E tax credit
【24h】

Tax incentives for innovation: time to restructure the R&E tax credit

机译:创新税收优惠:重组R&E税收抵免的时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The R&E tax credit has never been effective and subsequent attempts to restructure it have not addressed the major deficiencies. Moreover, in the 25 years since the R&E tax credit was enacted, a steadily increasing number of countries have implemented or expanded competing tax incentives, which in many cases are better structured and larger in size. As a result, the relative impact of the US credit is now negative in terms of incentives to conduct R&D within the domestic economy. The inadequacy of the credit stems largely from its small size and its incremental format. The impact of an R&D tax incentive is affected by its scope of coverage, the ability of industry to take advantage of it over the entire R&D cycle, the magnitude of the incentive relative to other nations' tax policies, and its ease of implementation. In the end, a tax incentive must sufficiently lower the user's cost of R&D to overcome barriers to allocation of private-sector resources commensurate with the potential rates of return on such investments. As a policy instrument, a tax incentive for R&D should be most effective if its form is a flat rate applied to all R&D.
机译:R&E税收抵免从未奏效,并且其重组尝试也未解决主要缺陷。此外,自R&E税收抵免颁布以来的25年中,越来越多的国家实施或扩大了竞争性税收优惠政策,在许多情况下,这些税收优惠政策结构更完善,规模更大。结果,就激励在国内经济中进行研发而言,美国信贷的相对影响现在为负。信贷的不足主要是由于信贷规模小和格式渐进。研发税收激励措施的影响范围包括其覆盖范围,行业在整个研发周期中利用它的能力,相对于其他国家税收政策的激励措施规模以及实施的难易程度。最后,税收激励措施必须充分降低用户的研发成本,以克服与此类投资的潜在回报率相称的私营部门资源配置障碍。作为一项政策工具,如果对所有研发都采用统一税率,则对研发的税收优惠应该是最有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号