首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Systematic Palaeontology >Phylogeny of Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda): comparative analysis and RESOLUTION
【24h】

Phylogeny of Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda): comparative analysis and RESOLUTION

机译:异龙的系统发育(恐龙:Theropoda):比较分析和解决方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Allosauroidea, a clade of large-bodied theropod dinosaurs that ranged from the Middle Jurassic until the Late Cretaceous, has been the subject of extensive phylogenetic study. However, despite the publication of 12 cladistic analyses little phylogenetic consensus has emerged, frustrating attempts to use these dinosaurs to study character evolution, biogeography and the quality of the fossil record. Here we analyse a core subset of allosauroids using cladistic methodology and several comparative methods. After reviewing previous studies and their points of disagreement, we present a new cladistic analysis that integrates data from these studies with new characters. This analysis finds strong support for placing Sinraptor as a basal allosauroid, Neovenator as a basal member of Carcharodontosauridae and Acrocanthosaurus as a more derived member of Carcharodontosauridae, rather than the sister taxon of Allosaurus as sometimes advocated. The current dataset is compared in detail to those of previous studies to determine the degree of overlap and the basis for differing topologies. These comparisons show that scoring differences, character choice and taxonomic sampling all play a major role in generating incongruence. Finally, the recovered most parsimonious topology is used to assess character evolution, stratigraphical congruence and biogeography. This topology shows a strong overall match with the stratigraphical record and is much more congruent with stratigraphy than any alternative topology. The biogeographical history of core allosauroids is found to be congruent with the breakup sequence of Pangaea, but more complete assessment is hampered by sampling biases.
机译:异龙亚科是大型的兽脚亚目恐龙的进化枝,范围从中侏罗纪到白垩纪晚期,已经成为广泛的系统发育研究对象。然而,尽管发表了12种主要分析方法,但几乎没有出现系统发育共识,这令人沮丧地尝试使用这些恐龙来研究性状进化,生物地理和化石记录的质量。在这里,我们使用cladistic方法和几种比较方法来分析同化别类的核心子集。在回顾了先前的研究及其分歧点之后,我们提出了一种新的分类分析,将这些研究的数据与新特征整合在一起。该分析为将Sinraptor定位为基底异龙,将Neovenator定位为Carcharodontosauridae的基础成员,将Acrocanthosaurus定位为Carcharodontosauridae的衍生成员,而不是像有时倡导的Allosaurus的姊妹分类群一样,提供了有力的支持。将当前数据集与以前的研究进行详细比较,以确定重叠程度以及不同拓扑的基础。这些比较表明,得分差异,角色选择和分类抽样均在产生不一致方面发挥了重要作用。最后,恢复的最简约拓扑被用于评估字符演化,地层一致性和生物地理学。该拓扑显示出与地层记录的整体匹配性强,并且比任何其他拓扑都更适合地层。发现核心别头类动物的生物地理历史与潘盖亚的破裂序列一致,但更完整的评估受到抽样偏差的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号